Social Psychology: The Dynamics of Group Influence and Individual Behavior

Human beings are inherently social, yet the mechanisms through which groups dictate individual choice often remain obscured by personal bias. In this module, we examine how the presence of others—whether real, imagined, or implied—transforms cognitive processing and behavioral output. Moving beyond simple observation, we dissect the tension between individual agency and the powerful undercurrents of social conformity, obedience, and group polarization.

---

PSY-260: Assessment 2 – Social Influence and Group Dynamics Brief

Course Information

• Course Code: PSY-260 / PSYC 300 / PSY 135

• Course Title: Social Psychology

• Academic Year: 2025–2026

• Level: Undergraduate (Level 5/6)

• Assessment Type: Written Essay / Research Report

• Word Count: 1,200 – 1,500 words (Approx. 4-6 pages)

• Weighting: 30% of Total Grade

Assessment Description

For this task, you are required to produce a critical analysis of a contemporary social phenomenon through the lens of established social psychological theories. You must select one specific event or trend (e.g., the spread of online misinformation, bystander apathy in urban environments, or the radicalization of niche online communities) and evaluate how normative and informational social influence contributed to the outcome.

Your analysis should not merely describe the event but must synthesize empirical research to explain the underlying psychological drivers. You are expected to integrate classic studies (e.g., Asch, Milgram, Zimbardo) with recent peer-reviewed findings from 2020–2026 to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of the field.

Assignment Requirements and Structure

1. Introduction (approx. 150 words): Define the chosen social phenomenon and clearly state your thesis regarding the psychological mechanisms at play.
2. Theoretical Framework (approx. 350 words): Detail the core social psychology theories relevant to your topic. Focus on
   • Social Identity Theory (SIT)
   • Cognitive Dissonance
   • Heuristic-Systematic Model of Persuasion
3. Application and Analysis (approx. 600 words): Synthesize your chosen phenomenon with the theoretical framework. Use specific examples of behavior to illustrate theoretical concepts.
4. Ethical and Cultural Considerations (approx. 200 words): Evaluate how cultural variables (Individualism vs. Collectivism) or ethical constraints in modern research impact our interpretation of this behavior.
5. Conclusion (approx. 200 words): Summarize the findings and suggest potential interventions based on social psychological principles.

Grading Rubric / Marking Criteria

Criteria	High Distinction (80-100%)	Pass (50-59%)
Critical Analysis	Sophisticated synthesis of theory and contemporary application.	Descriptive account with limited theoretical depth.
Research Integration	Uses 5+ high-quality, recent peer-reviewed sources effectively.	Uses fewer than 3 sources; reliance on textbooks.
Structure & Flow	Seamless transitions; logical progression of arguments.	Lacks clear structure; disjointed paragraphs.
Referencing	Flawless Harvard referencing throughout.	Several errors in citation format or bibliography.

---

Learning Materials and Bibliography

• Abrams, D. and Hogg, M.A. (2022). Social Identity and Social Cognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003254123

• Fiske, S.T. (2024). Social Beings: Core Motives in Social Psychology. 6th edn. New York: Wiley.

• Latané, B. and Darley, J.M. (2023). ‘The Unresponsive Bystander: 50 Years of Research’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(4), pp. 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12945

• Zimbardo, P.G. and Haney, C. (2025). ‘The Power of the Situation: Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment in the Digital Age’, American Psychologist, 80(2), pp. 88-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001234