Assessment Description

This 2,500-word reflective portfolio requires you to synthesize your learning from EDUC3004: Curriculum and Pedagogy and your concurrent professional placement. You will critically reflect on your ability to design, implement, and evaluate a play-based curriculum that adheres to the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) V2.0. This task is designed to meet AITSL Professional Standards for Teachers, specifically focusing on planning for and implementing effective teaching and learning (Standard 3).

Task Requirements

Your portfolio must be organized into the following four sections:

1. Philosophy of Play (500 words)

Articulate your personal pedagogical philosophy. You must integrate at least two contemporary theories (e.g., Socio-cultural theory, Post-structuralism) and explain how these theories inform your view of the child as a capable learner. Contrast your philosophy with the principles of the EYLF V2.0.

2. Curriculum Planning Cycle (800 words)

Document one complete planning cycle (Observe, Analyze, Plan, Implement, Reflect) for a small group of children. This section must include:

• De-identified observations (jottings, anecdotes, or photos).
• An analysis of learning linked to developmental milestones and EYLF outcomes.
• A detailed plan for a “follow-up” experience that extends the observed interest.

3. Critical Reflection on Practice (700 words)

Using the 4Rs model of reflection (Reporting, Responding, Relating, Reasoning), analyze a specific challenge you encountered during your placement. This could relate to behavior guidance, inclusive practice, or family engagement. You must support your reasoning with current academic literature.

4. Future Professional Goals (500 words)

Identify three specific areas for professional development based on your self-assessment against the National Quality Standards (NQS). Outline actionable steps you will take during your transition to a Graduate Teacher role in 2026.

Marking Criteria

1. Depth of Critical Reflection: Ability to move beyond description to deep critical analysis of teaching events and personal biases.
2. Theoretical Alignment: Evidence of a strong connection between classroom practice and early childhood theories (2018–2026).
3. Evidence of the Planning Cycle: Accurate documentation and analysis that demonstrates a logical progression in children’s learning.
4. Professional Literacy: Adherence to academic conventions, including APA 7th or Harvard referencing and professional tone.