NURS-FPX 4020 – Assessment 1: Nurse-to-Patient Ratios and Safety Outcomes

Assessment overview

Write a 1,200–1,500-word (approximately 4–5 page) analytical paper that examines how nurse-to-patient ratios in a specific care setting influence patient safety, quality of care, and nurse outcomes. Ground the analysis in current evidence and propose realistic, evidence-based strategies that a BSN-prepared nurse could use with stakeholders to improve staffing-related safety risks and associated costs.

Assessment context

Nurse-to-patient ratios are consistently linked to patient outcomes such as mortality, length of stay, falls, infections, and medication errors, as well as nurse burnout and turnover. Safe staffing is therefore a central quality and safety issue in BSN-level practice, requiring nurses to interpret local data, appraise evidence, and participate in quality-improvement efforts that align staffing models with patient needs and organizational resources.

Assessment instructions

1. Select a clinical context and staffing issue

• Choose a real or realistic practice setting (for example a medical-surgical unit, emergency department, intensive care unit, long-term care facility, or community hospital ward) where nurse-to-patient ratios are a concern.

• Identify a specific staffing pattern or ratio problem, such as:

  • Consistently high patient assignments for each nurse on day or night shift.

  • Frequent reliance on overtime or temporary staff to cover staffing gaps.

  • Understaffing on weekends or evenings with higher acuity patients.

  • Mismatch between nurse skill mix and patient complexity.

2. Describe the practice environment and safety concern

Use the structure below.

i. Practice environment

• Outline the unit type, typical patient population, and key organizational features such as bed capacity, common diagnoses, and current staffing model.

• Note any available indicators of safety culture or quality performance (for example incident reports, falls, infections, readmissions, or staff turnover patterns).

ii. Staffing-related safety concern

• Describe the current nurse-to-patient ratios and how they vary by shift, day of week, or patient acuity.

• Explain why these ratios present a safety and quality concern, using any local data or observed outcomes if available.

3. Analyze the impact of nurse-to-patient ratios on outcomes

Use current peer-reviewed evidence to analyze how the identified staffing pattern affects patients, nurses, and the organization.

i. Patient safety and quality outcomes

• Summarize evidence that links nurse-to-patient ratios to outcomes such as mortality, hospital-acquired conditions, adverse events, or patient satisfaction.

• Connect specific outcomes from the literature to the safety risks in your chosen setting (for example higher ratios associated with missed assessments, delayed responses, or medication errors).

ii. Nurse and system outcomes

• Discuss how staffing levels influence nurse burnout, job satisfaction, turnover, and moral distress.

• Explain how these workforce consequences feed back into patient safety, quality, and organizational performance, including financial implications such as overtime costs, turnover costs, and penalties related to quality metrics.

4. Propose evidence-based strategies to improve staffing-related safety risks

Develop feasible strategies that a BSN-prepared nurse can help initiate or support in collaboration with unit leaders and interprofessional stakeholders.

i. Evidence-informed interventions

• Identify and briefly summarize evidence-based strategies for improving nurse staffing and mitigating risks, such as acuity-based staffing tools, flexible float pools, structured handoff processes, or targeted quality-improvement projects focused on high-risk outcomes.

• Align each proposed strategy with specific safety and quality goals (for example reducing falls, improving timely assessments, decreasing medication errors, improving nurse retention).

ii. Stakeholder roles and collaboration

• Identify key stakeholders such as bedside nurses, charge nurses, nurse managers, staffing coordinators, physicians, and quality-improvement or finance leaders.

• Explain how you, as a BSN-prepared nurse, would collaborate with these stakeholders to present data, advocate for change, and participate in planning and evaluating staffing-related interventions.

iii. Quality, safety, and cost implications

• Discuss how improving nurse-to-patient ratios or implementing mitigation strategies is expected to enhance patient safety and quality outcomes.

• Analyze potential cost impacts for the organization, including avoided adverse events, reduced turnover, and improved efficiency.

5. Academic writing and format requirements

• Length: 1,200–1,500 words (approximately 4–5 pages), excluding title page and reference list.

• Format: Current APA style for headings, citations, and references.

• Sources: Minimum of 4–6 current peer-reviewed scholarly sources (2018–2026) that specifically address nurse staffing, patient outcomes, and safety or quality-improvement strategies.

• Writing quality: Clear, concise, logically organized academic prose with accurate citation of all ideas and data drawn from sources.

---

Scoring guide (marking criteria)

Criterion 1: Describe the practice setting and nurse-to-patient ratio concern

• High distinction: Provides a precise, context-rich description of the unit, patient population, and current staffing model, showing clear insight into how nurse-to-patient ratios operate in the chosen setting.

• Pass: Adequately describes the setting and mentions current ratios with basic contextual information.

• Needs development: Description is vague, generic, or omits essential details about staffing patterns or patient context.

Criterion 2: Analyze effects of nurse-to-patient ratios on safety and quality outcomes

• High distinction: Integrates high-quality evidence to provide a nuanced analysis of how staffing levels influence patient outcomes, nurse well-being, and organizational performance, with clear links to the selected setting.

• Pass: Explains key relationships between staffing and outcomes, supported by appropriate evidence.

• Needs development: Provides limited or mostly descriptive discussion with minimal evidence or weak linkage to safety and quality outcomes.

Criterion 3: Propose feasible, evidence-based strategies to address staffing-related safety risks

• High distinction: Presents a coherent set of realistic, evidence-based strategies that directly target identified risks, specifies how they could be implemented and evaluated, and anticipates potential barriers.

• Pass: Proposes plausible strategies supported by some evidence, with basic consideration of implementation.

• Needs development: Strategies are vague, not clearly evidence-based, or poorly matched to the identified staffing issue.

Criterion 4: Explain how a BSN-prepared nurse collaborates with stakeholders to improve safety and reduce costs

• High distinction: Clearly articulates specific collaboration roles and actions for the BSN-prepared nurse in working with stakeholders, connecting these actions to safety, quality, and cost outcomes.

• Pass: Identifies key stakeholders and describes general collaborative roles.

• Needs development: Limited identification of stakeholders or minimal explanation of collaborative roles and cost implications.

Criterion 5: Demonstrate scholarly writing and APA style

• High distinction: Writing is tightly structured, precise, and free of significant errors, with accurate and consistent APA style throughout.

• Pass: Writing is generally clear, with minor errors that do not impede understanding; APA style is mostly correct.

• Needs development: Frequent mechanical or APA errors interfere with clarity or professional tone.

Many BSN students choose a high-acuity medical-surgical unit where each nurse routinely cares for six or more patients and they then trace how this pattern contributes to missed assessments, delayed interventions, and preventable complications in the literature on nurse staffing and outcomes (Lasater et al. 2021). A well-constructed paper often connects these findings to local incident trends, staff burnout, and turnover, then outlines practical strategies such as acuity-based staffing tools, cross-training, and targeted quality-improvement projects that a frontline nurse can support with unit leaders. Many strong submissions also highlight how nurse advocacy, data presentation, and interprofessional collaboration can influence staffing decisions and ultimately reduce the cost of adverse events and workforce instability.

Recent references

• Lasater, KB et al. 2021, ‘Hospital nurse staffing and patient outcomes’, Journal of Clinical Nursing, vol. 30, no. 21–22, pp. 3153–3162, doi:10.1111/jocn.15102.

• Griffiths, P et al. 2019, ‘Nurse staffing levels, missed vital signs and mortality in hospitals: Retrospective longitudinal observational study’, Health Services and Delivery Research, vol. 7, no. 38, doi:10.3310/hsdr07380.

• Dall’Ora, C, Ball, J, Reinius, M & Griffiths, P 2020, ‘Burnout in nursing: A theoretical review’, Human Resources for Health, vol. 18, no. 1, article 41, doi:10.1186/s12960-020-00469-9.

• Aiken, LH et al. 2018, ‘Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine European countries: A retrospective observational study’, The Lancet, vol. 383, no. 9931, pp. 1824–1830, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62631-8.

• Griffiths, P et al. 2020, ‘The association between nurse staffing and omissions in nursing care: A systematic review’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 76, no. 12, pp. 3308–3322, doi:10.1111/jan.14557.