🎓 First order? Get 25% OFF — use code BISHOPS at checkout  |  💬 Chat on WhatsApp

Leading Change in Nursing Practice Proposal

📅 February 9, 2026 ✍️ Cpapers ⏱ 4 min read

NURS 4053: Leading Change in Nursing Practice – Assessment Task 1: Strategic Plan for Organizational Change

Assessment Overview

Course: NURS 4053 – Leading Change in Nursing Practice (RN-to-BSN / MSN Core)

Assessment Type: Change Management Proposal / Written Paper

Weighting: 30% of Final Grade

Length: a 4-to 6-page paper (excluding title and reference pages)

Writing a Similar Assignment?

Get a Scholar-Written Paper Matched to Your Brief

Every order is handled by a degree-holding expert in your subject — written to your exact rubric, fully original, and delivered ahead of your deadline.

Start My Order

Submission Format: Microsoft Word (.docx) via SafeAssign

Due Date: Day 7 of Week 4

Context

Healthcare organizations are dynamic environments where stagnation equates to regression. As a nurse leader, you are expected to identify gaps in clinical practice or workflow efficiency and drive evidence-based improvements. However, implementing change is rarely about the “what”—it is about the “how.” Resistance from staff, lack of resources, and institutional inertia are common barriers. This assessment requires you to act as a change agent by developing a comprehensive proposal that utilizes a theoretical framework to navigate these challenges and ensure sustainable improvement.

Task Description

You must identify a specific practice issue within your current or most recent workplace that requires intervention. Develop a strategic plan to address this issue using the following structure:

1. Problem Identification and Evidence

Define a clinical or operational problem (e.g., high rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infections, inefficient discharge processes, or low staff morale). Provide baseline data or anecdotal evidence to support the need for change. You must substantiate the significance of this problem with current peer-reviewed literature.

Stuck on Your Assignment?

Cola Papers Experts Are Ready Right Now

Join thousands of students who submit confidently. Human-written, plagiarism-checked, and formatted to your institution's exact standards.

Order My Custom Paper Use code BISHOPS for 25% off

2. Theoretical Framework Application

Select a recognized change management model to guide your strategy. You must use either Kotter’s 8-Step Process for Leading Change or Lewin’s 3-Stage Model of Change.

Explicitly map your proposed actions to the stages of your chosen model. For example, if using Lewin, detail what activities constitute the “Unfreezing” phase.

3. Strategic Implementation Plan

Outline the specific steps for implementation. This includes:

  • Stakeholder Analysis: Who needs to be involved? Who will resist?
  • Resource Allocation: What budget, technology, or staffing is required?
  • Timeline: A realistic schedule for rollout.

4. Evaluation Metrics

Determine how success will be measured. Define specific outcome measures (e.g., “Reduce fall rates by 15% within 6 months”) and process measures (e.g., “90% staff compliance with new protocol”).

Requirements & Formatting

  • Length: 4 to 6 pages. Content beyond the 6th page will not be graded.
  • Citations: A minimum of 5 peer-reviewed scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.
  • Formatting: Strict APA 7th Edition style (Title Page, Level 1 and 2 Headings, Running Head not required for student papers unless specified).

Grading Rubric / Marking Criteria

Criteria Exemplary (90-100%) Developing (Below 80%)
Problem & Evidence Clearly articulates a practice gap supported by robust internal data and external evidence. Problem is vague or lacks sufficient evidence to justify a major change initiative.
Application of Theory Expertly integrates the chosen change model; each stage of the model is specifically addressed with actionable steps. Mentions a model but fails to apply it structurally to the plan; stages are skipped or misunderstood.
Evaluation Strategy Proposes specific, measurable, and realistic metrics for both process and outcome evaluation. Evaluation plan is generic (e.g., “we will see if it works”) without quantifiable metrics.

The implementation of bedside shift reporting requires a fundamental shift in nursing culture, moving communication from the nurses’ station to the patient’s bedside. Applying Lewin’s Force Field Analysis reveals that the driving forces—increased patient safety and patient satisfaction—must outweigh the restraining forces, such as staff perception of increased time expenditure. During the “Unfreezing” stage, leadership must present data illustrating the correlation between communication failures and adverse events to create a sense of urgency. Once the team acknowledges the necessity of the new protocol, the “Moving” stage involves pilot testing the workflow on a single unit to refine the process before hospital-wide rollout. Marquis and Huston (2021) argue that involving frontline staff in the design of the new protocol significantly reduces resistance and enhances adherence (https://www.lww.com/leadership-roles-and-management-functions-in-nursing/9781975139216). Finally, the “Refreezing” stage is solidified by integrating bedside reporting into the annual competency review and publicly celebrating units that achieve high compliance rates. This structured approach ensures that the change becomes the new standard of practice rather than a temporary initiative.

 References (APA Format)

Our Key Guarantees

  • 100% Plagiarism-Free
  • On-Time Delivery
  • Student-Friendly Pricing
  • Human-Written Papers
  • Free Revisions (14 days)
  • 24/7 Live Support

Frequently Asked Questions About Our Essay Writing Service