NURS 340 Community Health Needs and Stakeholder Analysis Report
Unit Information
Course code: NURS 340 (or equivalent Community Health Nursing / Population Health at undergraduate level)
Course title: Community and Population Health Nursing
Assessment title: Assessment 2 – Community Health Needs and Stakeholder Analysis Report
Assessment type: Individual written report (community assessment and stakeholder analysis)
Weighting: 25–30% of final grade
Length: 1,500–2,000-word report (approximately 4–6 double-spaced pages, excluding title page, tables, and references)
Due: Week 7 (see unit schedule)
Assessment Description
You will produce a written report that integrates a concise community health needs assessment with a structured stakeholder analysis for a defined local population. The report will describe the community context and priority health needs using available data, formulate a preliminary community health diagnosis, identify key stakeholders, and analyse their interests, influence, and potential roles in addressing one priority health issue relevant to community health nursing practice.
Task Instructions
Step 1: Select Community, Health Focus, and Scope
-
Choose a clearly defined community, such as a suburb, town, local government area, campus community, or a specific vulnerable group within a geographic area.
-
Using publicly available data sources, identify one priority health issue affecting this community, such as diabetes, maternal health, mental health, substance use, childhood asthma, or falls in older adults.
-
Confirm that sufficient and reliable data are available to support your assessment and analysis.
Step 2: Structure of the Written Report (1,500–2,000 words)
Use the headings below. Brief tables or figures may be included where appropriate.
-
Community Profile (approximately 250–300 words)
-
Describe the community in terms of geography, population size, age distribution, and key demographic and socio-economic characteristics.
-
Summarise relevant contextual features such as housing, transport, employment patterns, and health or social service infrastructure.
-
Identify and cite the main data sources used.
-
-
Priority Health Issue and Needs Assessment (approximately 400–500 words)
-
Present data describing the selected health issue within the community, including prevalence, incidence, service use, or outcomes, and compare where possible with state or national benchmarks.
-
Discuss contributing behavioural, environmental, and social determinants of health.
Writing a Similar Assignment?
Get a Scholar-Written Paper Matched to Your Brief
Every order is handled by a degree-holding expert in your subject — written to your exact rubric, fully original, and delivered ahead of your deadline.
Start My Order -
Identify gaps in existing services, programs, or policies that contribute to unmet need.
-
-
Preliminary Community Health Diagnosis (approximately 150–200 words)
-
Formulate a concise community health diagnosis using an accepted structure.
-
Briefly justify why this issue should be prioritised at the current time.
-
-
Stakeholder Identification and Mapping (approximately 350–400 words)
-
Identify stakeholders who are affected by, influence, or can contribute to addressing the priority health issue.
-
Include a brief stakeholder table that outlines stakeholder groups and their interests or roles.
-
Analyse stakeholder interest, power or influence, and general position using a recognised framework such as a power–interest grid.
-
-
Stakeholder Analysis and Engagement Implications (approximately 250–300 words)
-
Analyse which stakeholders are critical for initiating and sustaining change.
-
Identify potential allies, champions, and sources of resistance.
-
Propose targeted engagement strategies for at least three key stakeholder groups.
-
-
Implications for Community Health Nursing Practice (approximately 150–200 words)
-
Explain how community and population health nurses could use the findings to inform planning, advocacy, and collaborative action.
-
Identify opportunities for nursing leadership in stakeholder engagement or service development.
Stuck on Your Assignment?
Cola Papers Experts Are Ready Right Now
Join thousands of students who submit confidently. Human-written, plagiarism-checked, and formatted to your institution's exact standards.
Order My Custom Paper Use code BISHOPS for 25% off
-
Formatting and Referencing Requirements
-
1,500–2,000 words, double-spaced, 12-point font, standard margins.
-
Use clearly labelled section headings aligned with the required structure.
-
Tables and figures are optional and excluded from the word count.
-
Apply APA 7th edition for all in-text citations and the reference list.
-
Include at least 8–10 recent sources published between 2018 and 2026, including peer-reviewed literature and credible local data sources.
Marking Criteria / Rubric
Criterion 1: Community Needs Assessment and Diagnosis (35%)
High distinction work demonstrates a strong, data-driven understanding of the community and priority health issue, with a clearly articulated and logically derived community health diagnosis. Pass-level work shows adequate description and analysis with some limitations in depth or precision. Unsatisfactory work lacks appropriate data, clarity, or alignment between assessment and diagnosis.
Criterion 2: Stakeholder Identification, Mapping, and Analysis (40%)
High distinction submissions identify a comprehensive range of relevant stakeholders and apply an appropriate framework to analyse interests, influence, and positions. Pass-level work identifies key stakeholders with partial analysis. Unsatisfactory work demonstrates limited identification and minimal analytical depth.
Criterion 3: Application to Nursing Practice, Structure, and Writing (25%)
High distinction responses clearly link assessment findings to community health nursing practice, demonstrate logical organisation, and maintain a high standard of academic writing. Pass-level responses show generally clear application and structure. Unsatisfactory responses lack clarity, organisation, or meaningful application to nursing practice.
Stakeholder Analysis Paragraph
Local primary care providers, community health nurses, and the municipal health department hold substantial influence over chronic disease services in the X district, although they do not experience daily barriers faced by residents related to transport, employment, and food insecurity. Community members and informal leaders, including tenant associations and faith-based organisations, have high interest and contextual knowledge despite lower institutional power, which positions them as essential partners in intervention design. Regional hospitals and private clinics control significant resources and referral pathways, yet their engagement in prevention may be limited unless priorities are aligned early. Applying a structured stakeholder analysis framework that considers knowledge, interest, power, and position supports the development of targeted engagement strategies and more sustainable community-based responses.
Additional Evidence-Informed Context
Community health needs assessments that are paired with systematic stakeholder analysis provide a stronger foundation for population-level interventions than needs assessment alone. Research indicates that early identification of stakeholder influence and interests improves the feasibility and sustainability of community health initiatives, particularly when power imbalances are acknowledged and addressed through participatory approaches. For community health nurses, this combined process strengthens advocacy efforts and supports the translation of assessment data into coordinated action across sectors. Structured stakeholder engagement also enhances accountability and alignment between community priorities and service planning outcomes (Brugha & Varvasovszky, 2018).
Learning Resources / References (2018–2026)
Rural and Urban Public Health Department (2022) Community Health Assessment Report: X Region. City: RUPHD. Available at https://www.ruphd.gov
Gilmore, G.D. and McDermott, R.J. (2018) Community Health Education and Promotion: A Guide to Program Design and Evaluation. 3rd edn. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Brugha, R. and Varvasovszky, Z. (2018) ‘Stakeholder analysis: A review of its concepts, uses, and methods in health policy and systems research’, Health Policy and Planning, 33(3), pp. 356–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx187
O’Rourke, T. and O’Rourke, M. (2022) ‘Community health needs assessment and diagnosis in primary health care nursing’, Primary Health Care Research & Development, 23, e41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423622000330
Institute for Healthcare Quality Improvement (2025) ‘Stakeholder analysis and engagement: Practical guidance for health projects’. University of North Carolina. Available at https://www.med.unc.edu/ihqi/resources/stakeholder-analysis
Our Key Guarantees
- ✓ 100% Plagiarism-Free
- ✓ On-Time Delivery
- ✓ Student-Friendly Pricing
- ✓ Human-Written Papers
- ✓ Free Revisions (14 days)
- ✓ 24/7 Live Support