Please see the attached paper along with the grading rubric. This assignment is worth 20% of your overall final grade and is due Week 8
\ngeographic area South Florida
\nWhooping Cough<\/p>\n
Purpose
\nThis paper should clearly and comprehensively identify the disease or population health problem
\nchosen. The problem must be an issue in your geographic area and a concern for the population
\nyou will serve upon graduation with your degree. The purpose of this assignment is to:
\n\u2022\tProvide learners with the opportunity to integrate knowledge and skills learned throughout this course
\n\u2022\tDirectly apply principles and knowledge learned in the course to problem solving of population health problems in their own geographic areas.
\nAssignment Outcomes
\nThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
\n1. Define key terms in epidemiology, community health, and population-based research.
\n2. Compare study designs used for obtaining population health information from surveillance, observation, community, and control trial-based research.
\n3. Identify appropriate outcome measures and study designs applicable to epidemiological subfields such as infectious disease, chronic disease, environmental exposures, reproductive health, and genetics.
\n4. Apply commonly used measures of health risk.
\n5. Examine current ethical\/legal issues in epidemiology.
\n6. Identify important sources of epidemiological data.
\n7. Evaluate a public health problem in terms of magnitude, person, time, and place.
\nRequirements
\n\u2022\tPage length: 6-10 pages, excluding title\/cover page
\n\u2022\tAPA Paper Writing Service by Expert Writers Pro Paper Help: Online Research Essay Help 7th edition
\n\u2022\tInclude at least one table to present information somewhere in the paper.
\n\u2022\tMust include at least 4-5 scholarly resources not older than 5 years
\nEpidemiology Paper: Descriptive Epidemiology of a Selected Infectious Disease
\nPlease select an infectious disease to explore in detail by using a descriptive epidemiological approach. Using the APA 7th edition Your Online Study Bay Assessment Task Assignment Help Manual as a reference, the scholarly paper should be no more than 10 and no less than 6 pages excluding title and reference page
\nSuperior Paper Help – Outline of the Assignment (make sure the paper includes the following)
\na)\tIntroduction with a clear presentation of the problem as well as significance and a scholarly overview of the paper.
\nb)\tDescribing an infectious disease to explore in detail by using a descriptive epidemiological approach. Background of the disease including definition, – description, signs and symptoms, and current incidence and\/or prevalence statistics current state, local, and national statistics pertaining to the disease. (Include a table of incidence or prevalence rates by your geographic county, state, and national statistics.)
\nc)\tA review of current surveillance methods and any mandated reporting or methods for
\nreporting the disease for providers.
\nd)\tIdentifying various sources of data for the epidemiological – description of a health disorder\/infectious disease
\ne)\tIdentifying host characteristics (age, gender, marital status, race etc.) and environmental attributes: geographic areas, income, housing, occupation, and education (essentially the main social determinants of health) as they relate to an infectious disease or health condition.
\nf)\tConduct descriptive epidemiology analysis of the disease including who is more frequently affected and characteristics of the population that might help in assignment brief – creating a prevention plan. Include costs (both financial and social) associated with the disease or problem.
\ng)\tIdentifying temporal variation: (secular, cyclic, seasonal, and epidemic) as they relate to an infectious disease or health condition.
\nh)\tSummarizing current hypotheses that have been proposed to explain the observed distribution of the infectious disease or health condition
\ni)\tReview how the disease is diagnosed, current national standards for screening or
\nprevention, and pick one screening test and review its sensitivity, specificity, positive
\npredictive value, cost and any current national guidelines for conducting which patients to conduct this test on.
\nj)\tListing gaps in knowledge about the distribution of an infectious disease or health condition.
\nk)\tProvide a brief plan of how you will address this epidemiological disease in your practice
\nonce you are finished with school. Provide three actions you will take along with how you will measure outcomes of your actions.
\nl)\tExamining areas for further epidemiological research related to an infectious disease or health condition. Conclude in a clear manner with a brief overview of key points of the entire disease
\nGrading Rubric – grade miners score
\nPaper Writing\tProficient\/Exemplary\tCompetent\tBeginner
\nIntroduction (30 pts) \t30 pts
\nClear introduction of the problem and infectious disease with a clear direction and purpose for the paper\t20 pts
\nMostly clear introduction that largely presents the problem and infectious disease\/health problem and a clear direction and purpose for the paper\t10 pts
\nPresents a vague introduction that only limitedly presents the problem and infectious disease\/health problem and fails to provide a clear and direct direction for the paper
\nDescriptive epidemiological approach is utilized to describe the infectious disease\/health problem. Background & significance data is included. County, state, and national data presented (make sure to include a table here to present the data) (45 pts)\t45 pts
\nThe infectious disease\/health problem is introduced and described using descriptive epidemiology. This includes definition, – description of signs and symptoms, current incidence and prevalence statistics at the state, local, and national level pertaining to the disease. Includes a comprehensive table of incidence and prevalence rates by geographic county, state, and national data. \t30 pts
\nThe infectious disease\/health problem is introduced and largely but not fully described using descriptive epidemiology. Most but not all the following information is included such as definition, – description of signs and symptoms, current incidence and prevalence statistics at the local, state and national level pertaining to the disease. Includes an adequate table of incidence and prevalence rates by geographic county, state, and national levels \t15 pts
\nThe infectious disease\/health problem is introduced but poorly and vaguely described using descriptive epidemiology. Limited information is provided about the disease definitions, – description of the signs and symptoms, current incidence and prevalence statistics at the local, state and national level pertaining to the disease. May or may not include a table provided the required county, state and national level data.
\nSurveillance methods and mandated reporting (30 pts)\t30 pts
\nCurrent and relevant surveillance methods and mandated reporting or\/and methods for reporting the disease to providers is well described.\t20 pts
\nCurrent and relevant surveillance methods and mandated reporting or\/and methods for reporting the disease to providers is mostly described but somewhat limited in scope. \t10 pts
\nCurrent and relevant surveillance methods and mandated reporting or\/and methods for reporting the disease to providers is limited and vaguely described.
\nSources of epidemiological data about the disease (30 pts) \t30 pts
\nA comprehensive variety of data sources are identified that provide an accurate and relevant – description of the health disorder\/infectious disease\t20 pts
\nAn adequate variety of data sources are identified that provide a good and somewhat accurate – description of the health disorder\/infectious disease\t10 pts
\nA limited variety of data sources are identified that provide a poor and inadequate – description of the health disorder\/infectious disease<\/p>\n
Host characteristics and environmental, geographic, income, housing, occupation (essentially primary SDOH) that relate to this infection\u2019s disease\/health condition (45 pts)
\n45 pts
\nComprehensive and thorough integration of the main social determinants of health that impact the infectious disease\/health condition including those outlined in the above section (e)\t30 pts
\nGood integration of the main social determinants of health that impact the infectious disease\/health condition including those outlined in the above section (e)\t15 pts
\nLimited and poor integration of the social determinants of health that impact the infectious\/health condition including those outlined in the above section (e)
\nReviews how disease is diagnosed, tested with specific information about screening, prevention, and screening test (45 pts) \t45 pts
\nComprehensively reviews how the disease is diagnosed, current national standards for screening and prevention are identified. At least one screening test is identified with a thorough analysis and review of the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, cost and current national guidelines for populations or patients who should be tested. \t30 pts
\nAdequately reviews how the disease is diagnosed, current national standards for screening and prevention are identified. At least one screening test is identified with a good analysis and review of the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, cost and current national guidelines for populations or patients who should be tested. \t15 pts
\nLimitedly reviews how the disease is diagnosed, current national standards for screening and prevention are poorly identified. A screening test may or may not be identified; with somewhat inaccurate and incomplete data regarding the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, cost and current national guidelines for populations or patients who should be tested.
\nEpidemiological analysis of the most affected population that assists in formulation of a prevention plan (including financial and social factors) (30 pts)\t30 pts
\nComprehensive descriptive epidemiological analysis which identifies the most affected population which informs a prevention plan which includes both financial and social factors associated with the disease\/problem\t20 pts
\nAdequate descriptive epidemiological analysis which identifies the most affected population which informs a prevention plan that includes both financial and social factors associated with the disease\/problem\t10 pts
\nLimited descriptive epidemiological analysis which identifies the most affected population which informs a prevention plan that includes both financial and social factors associated with the disease\/problem
\nTemporal variation identified (30 pts) \t30 pts
\nClear and evident identification of a temporal variation (secular, cyclic, seasonal or epidemic) that relates to the infectious disease\/health condition\t20 pts
\nGood and mostly clear identification of a temporal variation (secular, cyclic, seasonal or epidemic) that relates to the infectious disease\/health condition\t10 pts
\nLimited and vague identification of a temporal variation (secular, cyclic, seasonal or epidemic) that relates to the infectious disease\/health condition
\nCurrent hypothesis reflecting existing literature (30 pts)\t30 pts
\nIdentifies and accurately describes the current and existing hypothesis that reflects existing literature as the rationale for the observed variations or distribution of the infectious disease\/health condition\t20 pts
\nAdequate and mostly accurate – description of current and existing hypothesis that reflects existing literature as the rationale for the observed variations or distribution of the infectious disease\/health condition\t10 pts
\nLimited and vague – description of current and existing hypothesis that reflects existing literature as the rationale for the observed variations or distribution of the infectious disease\/health condition
\nGaps in knowledge about distributions are identified (30 pts)\t30 pts
\nClearly and concisely identifies gaps in knowledge about the distribution of the infectious disease or health problem\t20 pts
\nAdequate and mostly accurate gaps in knowledge about the distribution of the infectious disease or health problem\t10 pts
\nLimited and poorly identified gap in knowledge about the distribution of the infectious disease or health problem.
\nDetailed plan with 3 specific actions to address the epidemiological disease. Order Term Paper Writing Service & Research Report Writing – Three specific and measurable outcomes to address the identified actions. (45 pts)\t45 pts
\nProvides a thoughtful and realistic plan on how the student will address the epidemiological disease in student practice upon graduation. Provides a detailed – description of at least 3 actions along with specific and measurable outcomes for the proposed actions. \t30 pts
\nAdequate and mostly realistic plan on how the student will address the epidemiological disease in student practice upon graduation. Provides an adequate – description of at least 3 actions along with a somewhat specific and mostly measurable outcomes for the proposed actions. \t15 pts
\nLimited and somewhat unrealistic plan on how the student will address the epidemiological disease in student practice upon graduation. Provides an a somewhat vague and limited – description of 3 or less actions along with either no or some outcomes which are not measurable and\/or relate to the identified actions.
\nIdentifies areas for further epidemiological research related to the infectious disease\/health problem. Clear and concise summary of key points in the conclusion (45 pts)\t45 pts
\nComprehensively identifies areas for further epidemiological research grounded in evidence r\/t the infectious disease\/health condition. Clear and concise summary of the key points provided in the conclusion\t30 pts
\nAdequately identifies areas of further epidemiological research grounded in evidence r\/t the infectious disease\/health condition. Mostly clear and somewhat concise summary of the key points provided in the conclusion\t15 pts
\nLimitedly identifies areas of further epidemiological research which may or may not be grounded in evidence r\/t the infectious disease\/health condition. Vague and unclear or no summary of key points provided in the conclusion.
\nAPA online research essay service 7 th edition (30 pts) \t30 pts
\nPaper is formatted according to APA 7th ed. formatting including spacing, referencing in-text and reference page with less than 2 errors. \t20 pts
\nPaper is formatted according to APA 7th edition formatting including spacing, referencing in-text and reference page with more than 2 errors and less than 6 errors. \t10 pts
\nPaper does not follow correct APA 7thedition formatting in regard to spacing, referencing, in-text and reference page with greater than 6 errors.
\nSpelling, grammar and formatting and supporting literature (30 pts) \t30 pts
\nLess than 2-3 errors in spelling and grammar throughout paper as well as formatting. The paper has the required 4-5 scholarly resources. \t20 pts
\nGreater than 3 to 6 errors in spelling, grammar and formatting throughout paper. Paper has at least 3-4 scholarly resources are included within the past 5 years. \t10 pts
\nGreater than 6 errors in grammar, spelling and formatting throughout paper. Paper has less than the required 4 scholarly resources that are or are not within the 5 years.
\nTotal: 495 pts
\nStudent score<\/p>\n
Epidemiology Paper on Whooping Cough in South Florida.<\/p>\n
I. Introduction
\na) Clear presentation of the problem and significance
\nb) Scholarly overview of the paper<\/p>\n
II. Description of Whooping Cough (Pertussis)
\na) Definition and – description
\nb) Signs and symptoms
\nc) Current incidence and prevalence statistics (include a table)<\/p>\n
III. Surveillance Methods and Reporting
\na) Overview of current surveillance methods
\nb) Mandated reporting or methods for reporting the disease to providers<\/p>\n
IV. Sources of Epidemiological Data
\na) Identification of various sources for the epidemiological – description of Whooping Cough<\/p>\n
V. Social Determinants of Health and Whooping Cough
\na) Host characteristics (age, gender, marital status, race, etc.)
\nb) Environmental attributes: geographic areas, income, housing, occupation, education<\/p>\n
VI. Descriptive Epidemiological Analysis
\na) Identification of the most affected population
\nb) Characteristics of the population for prevention planning
\nc) Costs associated with the disease<\/p>\n
VII. Temporal Variation
\na) Identification of temporal variations related to Whooping Cough (secular, cyclic, seasonal, epidemic)<\/p>\n
VIII. Current Hypotheses
\na) – Summary of current hypotheses explaining the distribution of Whooping Cough<\/p>\n
IX. Diagnosis, Screening, and Prevention
\na) Review of the disease’s diagnosis
\nb) Current national standards for screening and prevention
\nc) Selection of a screening test and its analysis (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, cost, national guidelines)<\/p>\n
X. Gaps in Knowledge
\na) Identification of gaps in the understanding of Whooping Cough’s distribution<\/p>\n
XI. Addressing Whooping Cough in Practice
\na) Brief plan for addressing Whooping Cough in your practice
\nb) Order Term Paper Writing Service & Research Report Writing – Three specific actions with measurable outcomes<\/p>\n
XII. Areas for Further Epidemiological Research
\na) Identification of areas for future epidemiological research on Whooping Cough<\/p>\n
XIII. Conclusion
\na) Clear summary of key points covered in the paper<\/p>\n
XIV. APA Format – Best Help Writing My 99 Papers\u2014owl Essay Samplesting and References
\na) Ensure adherence to APA 7th edition formatting guidelines
\nb) Include at least 4-5 scholarly resources within the past 5 years<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Please see the attached paper along with the grading rubric. This assignment is worth 20% of your overall final grade and is due Week 8\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5068],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11597","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-write"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11597","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11597"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11597\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11599,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11597\/revisions\/11599"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11597"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11597"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11597"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}