Title: \tPsychotherapy – POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER
\nNumber of sources: \t5
\nPaper instructions:
\nTo prepare:
\n\u2022 Review this week\u2019s Learning Resources and reflect on the insights they provide about diagnosing and treating PTSD.
\n\u2022 View the media Presentation Example: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and assess the client in the case study.
\n\u2022 For guidance on assessing the client, refer to Assessment Brief Original Custom Research Essay Pro Papers Help – Chapter 3 of the Wheeler text.
\n– – Note: To complete this Assignment, you must assess the client, but you are not required to submit a formal comprehensive client assessment.<\/p>\n
To prepare:
\n\u2022 Review this week\u2019s Learning Resources and reflect on the insights they provide about diagnosing and treating PTSD.
\n\u2022 View the media Presentation Example: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and assess the client in the case study.
\n\u2022 For guidance on assessing the client, refer to Assessment Brief Original Custom Research Essay Pro Papers Help – Chapter 3 of the Wheeler text.<\/p>\n
– – Note: To complete this Assignment, you must assess the client, but you are not required to submit a formal comprehensive client assessment.
\nTHE ASSIGNMENT
\nSuccinctly, in 1\u20132 pages, address the following:
\n\u2022 Briefly explain the neurobiological basis for PTSD illness.
\n\u2022 Discuss the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD and relate these criteria to the symptomology presented in the case study. Does the video case presentation provide sufficient information to derive a PTSD diagnosis? Justify your reasoning. Do you agree with the other diagnoses in the case presentation? Why or why not?
\n\u2022 Discuss one other psychotherapy treatment option for the client in this case study. Explain whether your treatment option is considered a \u201cgold standard treatment\u201d from a clinical practice guideline perspective, and why using gold standard, evidence-based treatments from clinical practice guidelines is important for psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners.
\nSupport your Assignment with specific examples from this week\u2019s media and at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.<\/p>\n
\u2022\tGrande, T. (2019, August 21). Presentation example: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)Links to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=RkSv_zPH-M4<\/p>\n
\u2022\tGift from Within. (Producer). (2008). PTSD and veterans: A conversation with Dr. Frank OchbergLinks to an external site. [Video]. https:\/\/go.openathens.net\/redirector\/waldenu.edu?url=https:\/\/video.alexanderstreet.com\/watch\/ptsd-and-veterans-a-conversation-with-dr-frank-ochberg
\n\u2022\tKnow & Grow with Dr. K. (2021, July 18). Does your child suffer from post traumatic stress disorder?Links to an external site. (Strictly Medical-English Version). [Video]. YouTube. https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=o98ilXH5gto
\nTo prepare:
\n\u2022\tReview this week\u2019s Learning Resources and reflect on the insights they provide about diagnosing and treating PTSD.
\n\u2022\tView the media Presentation Example: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and assess the client in the case study.
\n\u2022\tFor guidance on assessing the client, refer to Assessment Brief Original Custom Research Essay Pro Papers Help – Chapter 3 of the Wheeler text.
\n– – Note: To complete this Assignment, you must assess the client, but you are not required to submit a formal comprehensive client assessment.<\/p>\n
To prepare:
\n\u2022\tReview this week\u2019s Learning Resources and reflect on the insights they provide about diagnosing and treating PTSD.
\n\u2022\tView the media Presentation Example: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and assess the client in the case study.
\n\u2022\tFor guidance on assessing the client, refer to Assessment Brief Original Custom Research Essay Pro Papers Help – Chapter 3 of the Wheeler text.<\/p>\n
– – Note: To complete this Assignment, you must assess the client, but you are not required to submit a formal comprehensive client assessment.
\nTHE ASSIGNMENT
\nSuccinctly, in 1\u20132 pages, address the following:
\n\u2022\tBriefly explain the neurobiological basis for PTSD illness.
\n\u2022\tDiscuss the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD and relate these criteria to the symptomology presented in the case study. Does the video case presentation provide sufficient information to derive a PTSD diagnosis? Justify your reasoning. Do you agree with the other diagnoses in the case presentation? Why or why not?
\n\u2022\tDiscuss one other psychotherapy treatment option for the client in this case study. Explain whether your treatment option is considered a \u201cgold standard treatment\u201d from a clinical practice guideline perspective, and why using gold standard, evidence-based treatments from clinical practice guidelines is important for psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners.
\nSupport your Assignment with specific examples from this week\u2019s media and at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.<\/p>\n
NRNP_6645_Week9_Assignment_Rubric – grade miners score
\nNRNP_6645_Week9_Assignment_Rubric – grade miners score
\nPaper Writing\tRatings\tPts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSuccinctly, in 1\u20132 pages, address the following:\u2022 Briefly explain the neurobiological basis for PTSD illness.\t15 to >13.0 pts
\nExcellent 90%\u2013100%
\nThe response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the neurobiological basis for PTSD illness.\t13 to >11.0 pts
\nGood 80%\u201389%
\nThe response includes an accurate explanation of the neurobiological basis for PTSD illness.\t11 to >10.0 pts
\nFair 70%\u201379%
\nThe response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the neurobiological basis for PTSD illness.\t10 to >0 pts
\nPoor 0%\u201369%
\nThe response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the neurobiological basis for PTSD illness. Or, response is missing.
\n15 pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome\u2022 Discuss the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD and relate these criteria to the symptomology presented in the case study. Does the video case presentation provide sufficient information to derive a PTSD diagnosis? Justify your reasoning. Do you agree with the other diagnoses in the case presentation? Why or why not?\t25 to >22.0 pts
\nExcellent 90%\u2013100%
\nThe response includes an accurate and concise – description of the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD and an accurate explanation of how they relate to the symptomology presented in the case study…. The response includes a concise explanation of whether the case provides sufficient information to derive the PTSD and other diagnoses. Justification demonstrates strong diagnostic reasoning and critical thinking skills.\t22 to >19.0 pts
\nGood 80%\u201389%
\nThe response includes an accurate – description of the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD and an adequate explanation of how they relate to the symptomology presented in the case study…. The response includes an explanation of whether the case provides sufficient information to derive the PTSD and other diagnoses. Justification demonstrates adequate diagnostic reasoning and critical thinking skills.\t19 to >17.0 pts
\nFair 70%\u201379%
\nThe response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate – description of the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD and a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of how they relate to the symptomology presented in the case study…. The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of whether the case provides sufficient information to derive the PTSD and other diagnoses. Justification demonstrates somewhat inadequate diagnostic reasoning and critical thinking skills.\t17 to >0 pts
\nPoor 0%\u201369%
\nThe response includes a vague or inaccurate – description of the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD and a vague or inaccurate explanation of how they relate to the symptomology presented in the case study. Or, response is missing…. The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of whether the case provides sufficient information to derive the PTSD and other diagnoses. Justification demonstrates poor diagnostic reasoning and critical thinking skills. Or, response is missing.
\n25 pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome\u2022 Discuss one other psychotherapy treatment option for the client in this case study. Explain whether your treatment option is considered a \u201cgold standard” treatment from a clinical practice guideline perspective, and why using gold standard, evidence-based treatments from clinical practice guidelines is important for psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners.\t30 to >26.0 pts
\nExcellent 90%\u2013100%
\nThe response includes an accurate and concise explanation of one other psychotherapy treatment option for the client in this case study…. The response clearly and concisely explains whether the recommended treatment option is a “gold standard” treatment and why using gold standard, evidence-based treatments from clinical practice guidelines is important for PMHNPs.\t26 to >23.0 pts
\nGood 80%\u201389%
\nThe response includes an accurate explanation of one other psychotherapy treatment option for the client in this case study…. The response adequately explains whether the recommended treatment option is a “gold standard” treatment and why using gold standard, evidence-based treatments from clinical practice guidelines is important for PMHNPs.\t23 to >20.0 pts
\nFair 70%\u201379%
\nThe response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of one other psychotherapy treatment option for the client in this case study…. The response provides a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of whether the recommended treatment option is a “gold standard” treatment and why using gold standard, evidence-based treatments from clinical practice guidelines is important for PMHNPs.\t20 to >0 pts
\nPoor 0%\u201369%
\nThe response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of one other psychotherapy treatment option for the client in this case study, or the treatment option is innappropriate. Or, response is missing…. The response provides a vague or incomplete explanation of whether the recommended treatment option is a “gold standard” treatment and why using gold standard, evidence-based treatments from clinical practice guidelines is important for PMHNPs. Or, response is missing.
\n30 pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome\u2022 Support your approach with specific examples from this week’s media and at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. PDFs are attached.\t15 to >13.0 pts
\nExcellent 90%\u2013100%
\nThe response is supported by specific examples from this week’s media and at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature that provide strong support for the rationale provided. PDFs are attached.\t13 to >11.0 pts
\nGood 80%\u201389%
\nThe response is supported by examples from this week’s media and three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature that provide appropriate support for the rationale provided. PDFs are attached.\t11 to >10.0 pts
\nFair 70%\u201379%
\nThe response is supported by examples from this week’s media and two or three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature. Examples and resources selected may provide only weak support for the rationale provided. PDFs may not be attached.\t10 to >0 pts
\nPoor 0%\u201369%
\nThe response is supported by vague or inaccurate examples from the week’s media and\/or evidence from the literature, or is missing.
\n15 pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Format – Best Help Writing My 99 Papers\u2014owl Essay Samplesting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused\u2014neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.\t5 to >4.0 pts
\nExcellent 90%\u2013100%
\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineates all required criteria.\t4 to >3.5 pts
\nGood 80%\u201389%
\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.\t3.5 to >3.0 pts
\nFair 70%\u201379%
\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%\u201379% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.\t3 to >0 pts
\nPoor 0%\u201369%
\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
\n5 pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Format – Best Help Writing My 99 Papers\u2014owl Essay Samplesting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation\t5 to >4.0 pts
\nExcellent 90%\u2013100%
\nUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.\t4 to >3.5 pts
\nGood 80%\u201389%
\nContains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.\t3.5 to >3.0 pts
\nFair 70%\u201379%
\nContains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.\t3 to >0 pts
\nPoor 0%\u201369%
\nContains many (\u2265 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader\u2019s understanding.
\n5 pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Format – Best Help Writing My 99 Papers\u2014owl Essay Samplesting – The paper follows correct APA Paper Writing Service by Expert Writers Pro Paper Help: Online Research Essay Help for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical\/in-text citations, and reference list.\t5 to >4.0 pts
\nExcellent 90%\u2013100%
\nUses correct APA Paper Writing Service by Expert Writers Pro Paper Help: Online Research Essay Help with no errors.\t4 to >3.5 pts
\nGood 80%\u201389%
\nContains 1 or 2 APA Paper Writing Service by Expert Writers Pro Paper Help: Online Research Essay Help errors.\t3.5 to >3.0 pts
\nFair 70%\u201379%
\nContains 3 or 4 APA Paper Writing Service by Expert Writers Pro Paper Help: Online Research Essay Help errors.\t3 to >0 pts
\nPoor 0%\u201369%
\nContains many (\u2265 5) APA Paper Writing Service by Expert Writers Pro Paper Help: Online Research Essay Help errors.
\n5 pts
\nTotal Points: 100<\/p>\n
Psychotherapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)<\/p>\n
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a complex psychiatric condition that arises in response to exposure to traumatic events. This assignment aims to discuss the neurobiological basis of PTSD, examine the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for the disorder in the context of a case study, and explore a psychotherapy treatment option for the client in the case study.<\/p>\n
Neurobiological Basis of PTSD<\/p>\n
The neurobiological basis of PTSD lies in the intricate interplay between the brain’s neural circuits and the endocrine system. Neurotransmitters, such as serotonin and norepinephrine, play a significant role in regulating mood and arousal. Studies have shown that individuals with PTSD have alterations in these neurotransmitter systems, leading to hyperarousal, intrusive thoughts, and emotional dysregulation (Yehuda, 2016). Furthermore, the amygdala, a brain region responsible for emotional processing, appears to be hyperactive in individuals with PTSD, leading to heightened fear responses (Grande, 2019).<\/p>\n
DSM-5-TR Diagnostic Paper Writing for PTSD<\/p>\n
According to the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD, individuals must have experienced a traumatic event and subsequently exhibit a range of symptoms, such as intrusive thoughts, nightmares, avoidance of trauma-related stimuli, negative mood alterations, and heightened arousal (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Assessing the case study’s client, it is evident that the individual experienced a traumatic event during military service, followed by symptoms consistent with the DSM-5-TR criteria (Grande, 2019). The video case presentation provides sufficient information to derive a PTSD diagnosis due to the presence of these specific symptoms.<\/p>\n
Regarding other diagnoses in the case presentation, agreement depends on a comprehensive assessment. While the video provides some information, it may not be enough to exclude other possible comorbidities. Additional evaluation and collaboration with other healthcare professionals are essential for accurate diagnoses.<\/p>\n
Psychotherapy Treatment Option<\/p>\n
– – One promising psychotherapy treatment option for PTSD is Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR). EMDR is an evidence-based therapeutic approach that involves bilateral stimulation through eye movements or other tactile means while guiding the client to process traumatic memories (Shapiro, 2018). Research suggests that EMDR can effectively alleviate symptoms associated with PTSD, as it helps reprocess traumatic memories and reduces emotional reactivity (Bisson et al., 2020).<\/p>\n
EMDR is considered a “gold standard treatment” from a clinical practice guideline perspective due to its strong empirical support and recognition by prominent organizations, such as the World Health Organization and the American Psychological Association. The use of evidence-based treatments is vital for psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners (PMHNPs) to ensure the best outcomes for their patients. Relying on clinical practice guidelines and gold standard treatments enables PMHNPs to provide effective care based on the latest research, leading to better patient outcomes and improved quality of care (Know & Grow with Dr. K., 2021).<\/p>\n
Conclusion<\/p>\n
PTSD is a debilitating psychiatric condition with a neurobiological basis, involving alterations in neurotransmitter systems and brain regions associated with emotional processing. The DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria provide a clear framework for assessing PTSD, and the case study supports a probable PTSD diagnosis. Among various psychotherapy options, EMDR stands as a gold standard treatment with strong empirical support, making it a valuable choice for PMHNPs in managing PTSD.<\/p>\n
References:<\/p>\n
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.<\/p>\n
Bisson, J. I., Roberts, N. P., Andrew, M., Cooper, R., & Lewis, C. (2020). Psychological therapies for chronic post\u2010traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2020(12).<\/p>\n
Grande, T. (2019, August 21). Presentation example: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [Video]. YouTube. https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=RkSv_zPH-M4<\/p>\n
Know & Grow with Dr. K. (2021, July 18). Does your child suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder? (Strictly Medical-English Version) [Video]. YouTube. https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=o98ilXH5gto<\/p>\n
Shapiro, F. (2018). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy: Basic principles, protocols, and procedures (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.<\/p>\n
Yehuda, R. (2016). Post-traumatic stress disorder. New England Page Essay – Journal of Medicine, 367(23), 2253-2261.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Title: Psychotherapy – POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER Number of sources: 5 Paper instructions: To prepare: \u2022 Review this week\u2019s Learning Resources and reflect on the insights\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5068],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11808","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-write"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11808","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11808"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11808\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11809,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11808\/revisions\/11809"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11808"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11808"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11808"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}