Assessment Brief
\nSchool of Nursing and Midwifery<\/p>\n
NUR3605 \u2013 Leadership, Governance and Culture
\nAss. Item #\tAssessment Type
\nAs stated in CAPS
\nClick on textbox below to select the CAPS Assessment Type
\nAssessment Description
\nAs stated in CAPS\tWeighting\tWord count
\nUndergraduate
\n10% = 300-350 words
\nPostgraduate:
\n10% = 500 words
\n1\tAssignment\tReport\t 50%\t1750 words<\/p>\n
Due date and submission information\tSubmit via CANVAS in Turnitin by 4pm, September 4th 2023. Please ensure that you have read and understood the \u2018before you submit an assignment\u2019 information attached to this assignment brief.<\/p>\n
Why am I doing this assessment?
\nThis assignment will help you to understand and demonstrate the following unit learning outcomes (ULO):
\n1.\tResearch Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer – Critique best practice principles for governance in the clinical environment.
\n2.\tExplain the roles of nurses and other health professionals in implementing quality improvement methodologies.
\n3.\tExamine how the National Safety and Quality Health Service standards govern clinical practice.<\/p>\n
– . completing these ULOs, you are demonstrating that you are working towards the following course learning outcomes (CLOs) and therefore, the related professional standards:
\n\u2022\tCLO2: Critically analyse, interpret, and conceptualise complex nursing practice.
\n\u2022\tCLO4: Access, evaluate and synthesise relevant information from multiple sources using digital technologies to inform nursing practice.
\n\u2022\tCLO5: Independently communicate nursing knowledge, concepts and values clearly and coherently.
\nThe following course learning outcome\/s will also be consolidated in this unit:
\n\u2022\tCLO6: Demonstrate a global outlook with respect for cultural diversity, including Indigenous cultural competence.
\n\u2022\tCLO8: Demonstrate autonomy, accountability and judgement for own learning and professional nursing practice in accordance with the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia standards for practice.
\nEmployability skills addressed
\nSelect all that apply
\nEMPLOYABILITY SKILLS
\n0 Reflective practice
\n1 Decision making
\n1 Critical thinking
\n1 Problem solving
\n1 Communication
\n0 Digital literacy
\n0 Conflict resolution
\n0 Time management
\n0 Teamwork
\n0 Cultural competency
\n1 Leadership
\n1 Creativity and Innovation
\nPERSONAL ATTRIBUTES
\n0 Self-awareness
\n0 Self-efficacy
\n1 Professional identity
\n0 Resilience
\n0 Interpersonal skills
\n1 Interprofessional coordination
\n0 Emotional intelligence
\n0 Cross-cultural awareness<\/p>\n
CAREER MANAGEMENT SKILLS
\n0 Self-awareness
\n0 Career decision making
\n1 Opportunity awareness
\n0 Transition learning
\n0 Career planning
\n1 Specialist skills (course specific)<\/p>\n
Assessment Task Instructions
\nThe assessment instructions have been designed to enable you to understand what is required to succeed in this assignment.
\nThe aim of this Assignment is to show your understanding of the process by which sentinel events are reviewed and learning occurs – making way for improvements in the future. The process of completing this assignment will consolidate your understanding of quality improvement methodology.
\n\u2022\tStep 1: Read the attached From Death We Learn \u2013 Opioid toxicity. – – Note that this is an incomplete replication of the original as we want you to come up with your own ideas and actions.
\n\u2022\tStep 2: Use a systematic approach to review the case and identify possible causes of the event. Determine two main themes or situational factors that you wish to address in the following steps. In the appendix show the systematic approach you took to review the case and the findings you made.
\no\t In your discussion of this event, you are NOT required to make professional or clinical care recommendations in regard to the actions of the nurses\/health care workers involved.
\n\u2022\tStep 3: Based on your findings in step two, review relevant literature to determine what should have occurred in this scenario, noting if there were gaps in practice or deviations from best practice guidelines in relation to the two areas you wish to focus improvements on.
\n\u2022\tStep 4: Discuss the case in relation to what you have found in step 3
\n\u2022\tStep 5: Using a quality methodological approach recommend two actions, supported by literature that could be implemented for a change in practice to circumvent such events recuring.<\/p>\n
Format – Best Help Writing My 99 Papers\u2014owl Essay Samples and Structure
\nThis is a formal report, and you must follow the guidelines provided below and those in the tutorials and Canvas site:<\/p>\n
\u2022\tTitle Page
\n\u2022\tExecutive summary\/abstract (max 200 words- non-structured, must be a summary of the entire report, not a replication of the introduction)
\n\u2022\tTable of contents
\n\u2022\tIntroduction (Approx 150 words)
\n\u2022\tBackground \u2013 relevant review of literature for best practice (Approx 300 words)
\n\u2022\tDiscussion \u2013 relate the case to the findings in the literature, policies and best practice documents (Approx 600 words)
\n\u2022\tRecommendations for two changes in practice (Approx 300 words)
\n\u2022\tConclusions (Approx 200 words)
\n\u2022\tReferences (APA7th)<\/p>\n
For general formatting, please follow the SNM assessment guide
\nWhat you should include
\nPlease refer to the report writing ppt in Canvas<\/p>\n
Connecting your learning
\nAssessment tasks in this course are designed to give you opportunities to integrate what you learn into or from other units.
\nMarking rubric
\nThe marking rubric has been attached to the assessment in Canvas.<\/p>\n
Feedback and moderation
\nYour results and feedback will be released in 15 working days from submission via Turnitin.
\nAll unit assessments are subject to a robust moderation process. – – Note that results are not final until they are officially released at the end of semester following ratification at the progression panel and are therefore subject to change.
\nAdditional Resources<\/p>\n
\u2022\tLibrary Referencing Human Written Academic Papers – Guide
\n\u2022\tAcademic Integrity<\/p>\n
“From Death We Learn \u2013 Opioid toxicity”:
\nIntroduction
\nThis report examines a sentinel event case study involving opioid toxicity that resulted in patient death. A systematic review of the case identifies two key themes – gaps in opioid administration guidelines and lack of interprofessional communication – that contributed to this tragic outcome. Recommendations are proposed to address these issues through quality improvement initiatives.
\nBackground
\nProper opioid administration and monitoring are essential to prevent adverse events like overdose (National Health Service, 2018). Human Written Academic Papers – Guidelines outline safe dosing limits, required monitoring, and steps for identifying and treating overdose (Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, 2016). However, gaps and lack of standardized protocols can lead to errors (The Joint Commission, 2016).
\nEffective interprofessional communication is also vital for patient safety. The World Health Organization (2020) emphasizes sharing complete patient information, especially during care transitions. However, siloed documentation and unaddressed assumptions can impede coordination (Kohn et al., 2000).
\nDiscussion
\nIn this case, gaps in the opioid administration guidelines may have contributed to exceeding the safe dosing limits. While the patient’s condition merited around-the-clock monitoring, protocols did not clearly define responsibilities during shift changes. Furthermore, lack of communication between nurses potentially led to missing signs of impending overdose.
\nRecommendations
\nTo address these issues, I recommend:
\nDeveloping a standardized electronic opioid administration protocol outlining clear dosing limits, required monitoring, and responsibilities during shift changes. This could help minimize human errors from gaps or inconsistencies in existing guidelines.
\nImplementing bedside handoff reporting to facilitate real-time information exchange between nurses. Including all caregivers would help surface any assumptions and ensure no details are overlooked (World Health Organization, 2020).
\nConclusion
\nSentinel event reviews provide valuable lessons to enhance safety. – . addressing the systematic and human factors identified, these quality improvement recommendations aim to help circumvent similar tragic outcomes in the future.
\nReferences<\/p>\n
Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. (2016). PS09 guideline on acute pain management. https:\/\/www.anzca.edu.au\/getattachment\/resources\/professional-documents\/ps09-2016-guidelines-on-acute-pain-management.pdf
\nKohn, L., Corrigan, J., & Donaldson, M. (Eds.). (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. National Academies Press.
\nNational Health Service. (2018). Safe and appropriate use of high-risk medications. https:\/\/www.england.nhs.uk\/publication\/safe-and-appropriate-use-of-high-risk-medications\/<\/p>\n
The Joint Commission. (2016). Sentinel event alert: Safe use of opioids in hospitals. https:\/\/www.jointcommission.org\/resources\/patient-safety-topics\/sentinel-event\/sentinel-event-alert-newsletters\/sentinel-event-alert-56-safe-use-of-opioids-in-hospitals\/
\nWorld Health Organization. (2020). Communication during patient hand-overs. https:\/\/www.who.int\/publications\/i\/item\/communication-during-patient-hand-overs<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Assessment Brief School of Nursing and Midwifery NUR3605 \u2013 Leadership, Governance and Culture Ass. Item # Assessment Type As stated in CAPS Click on textbox\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5241,5233,5243,5232,4206,5239,5240,5236,5238,5235,5242,5234,5244,5068,5237],"tags":[5377,5380,5378,5385,5379,5382,5383,5375,5384,5386,5389,5376,5387,5381,5388],"class_list":["post-12516","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-custom-essay","category-dissertation-ideas","category-dissertation-topic","category-essay-topics","category-free-essays","category-help-in-assignment","category-help-with-class","category-i-need-help","category-page-paper","category-research-paper-samples","category-term-paper","category-thesis-examples","category-thesis-writers","category-write","category-write-a-paper","tag-best-college-paper-writing-service","tag-can-someone-write-my-essay","tag-cheap-paper-writer-websites-for-school","tag-college-essay-writing-help","tag-essay-writer-free-generator","tag-free-essay-typer","tag-get-help-with-assignments","tag-help-me-write-my-term-paper","tag-help-with-my-essay","tag-help-writing-my-essay-professional-paper-writing-service","tag-i-need-help-writing-a-paper","tag-paying-someone-to-write-a-paper","tag-personalised-writing-paper","tag-please-write-my-essay","tag-write-my-term-paper-cheap"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12516","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12516"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12516\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12516"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12516"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12516"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}