OPSCB\/574 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric – grade miners score
\nCourse Title: Creating Value Through Operations
\nCompetency Assessment Title: Statistical Process Control Methods
\nTotal Number of Points: 100
\nAssignment Directions
\nStep 1: Process Evaluation
\nCreate a new Word doc for the elements of this assignment.
\nEvaluate your process using 1 of the following:
\n\u2022 Use the lean concept to find ways to eliminate waste and improve the process.
\n\u2022 Use SPC or Six Sigma to reduce defects or variances in the process.
\nAdd your evaluation to your Word doc with the header “Process Evaluation.”
\nStep 2: Evaluation of Control Chart and Process Metrics
\nComplete the following in Excel:
\n\u2022 Calculate the defined process metrics including variation and process capability.
\n\u2022 Develop and display a control chart for the process.
\n\u2022 Evaluate the control chart and process metrics using Statistical Process Control (SPC) methods. Determine whether the process could benefit from the
\nuse of Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools. (Include all calculation and charts.)
\nWrite your evaluation in your assignment Word doc under the header “Evaluation of Control Chart and Process Metrics.”
\nOPSCB\/574 Competency 1 Rubric – grade miners score Page 2 of 3
\nStep 3: Executive Summary
\nWrite a 700-word executive summary that includes the following:
\n\u2022 A summary of the Process Evaluation (using either Lean or SPC or Six Sigma)
\n\u2022 A summary of the Evaluation of Control Chart and Process metrics based on SPC methods
\n\u2022 A summary of your evaluation of whether the process would benefit from the use of Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools
\n\u2022 A – description of the SPC project and recommendations for improvements
\nAdd your summary to your Word doc with the header, “Executive Summary.”
\nOPSCB\/574 Competency 1 Rubric – grade miners score Page 3 of 3
\nCompetency Assessment Rubric – grade miners score
\nAssignment\/Performance
\nCriteria
\nMastery
\n100%
\nMeets Expectations
\n85%
\nNot Met
\n0%
\n1. Evaluation of the process
\n(weight 20%)
\nThoroughly evaluated the process. Partially evaluated the process. Narrowly evaluated the process or
\ndid not submit evaluation of
\nprocess.
\n2. Evaluation of the control chart and
\nprocess metrics using the statistical
\nprocess control methods
\n(weight 20%)
\nThoroughly evaluated the control
\nchart and process metrics using
\nstatistical process control methods.
\nPartially evaluated the control chart
\nand process metrics using statistical
\nprocess control methods.
\nNarrowly evaluated the control chart
\nand process metrics using statistical
\nprocess control methods or did not
\nsubmit evaluation of the control chart
\nand process metrics using statistical
\nprocess control methods.
\n3. Process evaluation summary
\n(weight 10%)
\nThoroughly developed a summary of
\nthe process evaluation.
\nPartially developed a summary of
\nthe process evaluation.
\nNarrowly developed a summary of the
\nprocess evaluation or did not submit a
\nsummary of the process evaluation.
\n4. Summary of control chart and
\nprocess metrics based on SPC
\nmethods
\n(weight 10%)
\nThoroughly developed a summary of
\nthe evaluation of control chart and
\nprocess metrics based on SPC
\nmethods.
\nPartially developed a summary of
\nthe evaluation of control chart and
\nprocess metrics based on SPC
\nmethods.
\nNarrowly developed a summary of the
\nevaluation of control chart and
\nprocess metrics based on SPC
\nmethods or did not submit a summary
\nof the process evaluation.
\n5. Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools
\nevaluation summary
\n(weight 10%)
\nThoroughly developed a summary of
\nthe evaluation of whether the
\nprocess would benefit from the use
\nof Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools.
\nPartially developed a summary of
\nthe evaluation of whether the
\nprocess would benefit from the use
\nof Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools.
\nNarrowly developed a summary of the
\nevaluation of whether the process
\nwould benefit from the use of Six
\nSigma, Lean, or other tools or did not
\nsubmit a summary of the evaluation of
\nwhether the process would benefit
\nfrom the use of Six Sigma, Lean, or
\nother tools
\n6. Description of the Statistical
\nProcess Control (SPC) project
\n(weight 15%)
\nProvided a detailed – description of the
\nSPC project.
\nProvided a partial – description of the
\nSPC project. Provided a narrow – description of the
\nSPC project or did not provide a
\n– description of the SPC project.
\n7. Recommendations for
\nimprovement
\n(weight 15%)
\nProvided detailed recommendations
\nfor improvements.
\nProvided partial recommendations
\nfor improvements. Provided vague recommendations
\nfor improvements or did not provide
\nrecommendations for improvements.<\/p>\n
____________________
\nHere is a rubric for assessing the competency in creating value through operations, specifically focusing on statistical process control methods:<\/p>\n
OPSCB\/574 Competency 1 Rubric – grade miners score<\/p>\n
Assignment\/Performance Criteria\tMastery (100%)\tMeets Expectations (85%)\tNot Met (0%)
\nEvaluation of the process (weight 20%) | Thoroughly evaluated the process. | Partially evaluated the process. | Narrowly evaluated the process or did not submit evaluation of the process.
\nEvaluation of the control chart and process metrics using the statistical process control methods (weight 20%) | Thoroughly evaluated the control chart and process metrics using statistical process control methods. | Partially evaluated the control chart and process metrics using statistical process control methods. | Narrowly evaluated the control chart and process metrics using statistical process control methods or did not submit evaluation of the control chart and process metrics using statistical process control methods.
\nProcess evaluation summary (weight 10%) | Thoroughly developed a summary of the process evaluation. | Partially developed a summary of the process evaluation. | Narrowly developed a summary of the process evaluation or did not submit a summary of the process evaluation.
\nSummary of control chart and process metrics based on SPC methods (weight 10%) | Thoroughly developed a summary of the evaluation of control chart and process metrics based on SPC methods. | Partially developed a summary of the evaluation of control chart and process metrics based on SPC methods. | Narrowly developed a summary of the evaluation of control chart and process metrics based on SPC methods or did not submit a summary of the process evaluation.
\nSix Sigma, Lean, or other tools evaluation summary (weight 10%) | Thoroughly developed a summary of the evaluation of whether the process would benefit from the use of Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools. | Partially developed a summary of the evaluation of whether the process would benefit from the use of Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools. | Narrowly developed a summary of the evaluation of whether the process would benefit from the use of Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools or did not submit a summary of the evaluation of whether the process would benefit from the use of Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools.
\nDescription of the Statistical Process Control (SPC) project (weight 15%) | Provided a detailed – description of the SPC project. | Provided a partial – description of the SPC project. | Provided a narrow – description of the SPC project or did not provide a – description of the SPC project.
\nRecommendations for improvement (weight 15%) | Provided detailed recommendations for improvements. | Provided partial recommendations for improvements. | Provided vague recommendations for improvements or did not provide recommendations for improvements.
\nThe rubric evaluates the following aspects of the assignment:<\/p>\n
Evaluation of the process.
\nEvaluation of the control chart and process metrics using statistical process control methods.
\nProcess evaluation summary.
\nSummary of the control chart and process metrics based on SPC methods.
\nSix Sigma, Lean, or other tools evaluation summary.
\nDescription of the Statistical Process Control (SPC) project.
\nRecommendations for improvement.
\nEach criterion is assigned a weight, indicating its importance in the overall assessment. The “Mastery” column represents the criteria that demonstrate a thorough understanding and application of the concepts, while the “Meets Expectations” column indicates a satisfactory level of achievement. The “Not Met” column signifies that the criteria were not adequately addressed or not submitted.<\/p>\n
Grades can be assigned based on the performance level achieved in each criterion, and the total score can be calculated to determine the overall competency assessment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
OPSCB\/574 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric – grade miners score Course Title: Creating Value Through Operations Competency Assessment Title: Statistical Process Control Methods Total Number of Points: 100 Assignment Directions Step 1: Process Evaluation Create a new Word doc for the elements of this assignment. Evaluate your process using 1 of the following: \u2022 Use […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5584,5217,5589,5586,5591,5594,5590,5587,5583,5593,5592,5588,5582,5585,5595],"tags":[5597,5601,5602,5605,3665,5603,2339,5607,4868,5598,5604,5606,5600,3325,5599,5596],"class_list":["post-13821","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-assessment-homework-help-online","category-australia-essays","category-best-ideas-for-dissertation-topics","category-best-ideas-for-research-paper-topics-in","category-best-thesis-topics-and-ideas-on-different-subjects","category-dissertation-topics-good-thesis-ideas","category-dissertation-topics-for-ph-d-and-thesis-ideas","category-dissertation-topics-for-students-in","category-help-with-australia-assessment-assignment","category-research-topics-for-college-students","category-sample-thesis-titles","category-trending-dissertation-topics-ideas-for","category-uk-assessment-assignment-help","category-uk-essays","category-undergraduate-dissertations-topics-examples-ideas","tag-essay-service-website","tag-essay-writer-from-usa","tag-hire-a-professional-essay-writer","tag-hire-essay-writer-for-your-papers","tag-i-need-help-writing","tag-i-will-pay-someone-to-write-my-essay","tag-looking-for-someone-to-do-my-assignments","tag-online","tag-page-paper","tag-pay-for-essay-get-top-quality","tag-pay-someone-to-write-my-paper","tag-professional-paper-writing-service","tag-professional-to-write-my-essay","tag-write-a-paper","tag-write-my-essay-for-me-by-native-writer","tag-write-my-essay-no-plagiarism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13821","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13821"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13821\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13821"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13821"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13821"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}