NRSG375 Clinical Leadership
\nAssessment Task 3: Written assignment (45%)
\nDiscuss and analyse in more detail 2 of the discussion posts that you submitted for assessment task (AT) 2 and use contemporary literature for support. For the 2 posts that you choose, you are to re-write (not duplicate) the posts you choose to critically discuss and analyse professional leadership in nursing in further detail to that provided in your original discussion posts. Building on your engagement and feedback in the discussion forum posts you will expand your responses through the use of sound written and analytical communication skills, to analyse in greater depth the major theoretical foundations of leadership and their application to nursing practice. To enable you to do this you must read and research widely and use further contemporary literature to support your stance in addition to the literature cited in your original discussion posts. This is to demonstrate your understanding of the contribution of sound leadership that enhances service delivery to improve health care outcomes. You must also include again as you did in AT2, screen shot evidence of your original entire posts and response post in a single (1) collated word document via Turnitin on LEO. This AT has a word limit of 1200 words +\/- 10%.
\n Homework Help – Topics:
\n1 – Modules 1 & 2.
\nClinical leadership is not an important consideration as I am about to graduate as a novice RN. My focus is really about increasing my confidence and improve my clinical skills to be a competent clinician in my first year as a graduate RN. Critically reflect and discuss in your first online post (ensure you support your point of view with contemporary literature) Modules 1 & 2. (LO2)
\n2 – Modules 3 & 4.
\nAutonomy and accountability are integral to nursing as a profession. How do these professional expectations relate to leadership qualities required for the RNs safe practice? Critically reflect and discuss this for your second online post (ensure you support your point of view with contemporary literature) Modules 3 & 4. (LO4).
\n3 – Modules 5 & 6
\nAs a graduate RN in what way(s) am I expected to contribute to positive change and innovation in the health care environment? Critically reflect and discuss this for your third online post (ensure you support your point of view with contemporary literature) Modules 5 & 6. (LO5)
\nYou are expected to approach this assessment task as an opportunity to showcase your written analytical skills in the format of an academic paper. You may find the following link to the academic skill unit page on academic writing of assistance with this.
\nhttps:\/\/leo.acu.edu.au\/mod\/book\/view.php?id=1888062&chapterid=116929
\nThe expectation is that you build on the use of the contemporary literature to support your view in responding to the topics\/questions from your online posts in assignment 2 in this next assessment task. The following link may assist you to do that. https:\/\/leo.acu.edu.au\/mod\/book\/view.php?id=1888100
\nReferencing is integral to academic writing, in the Faculty of Health Sciences, the prescribed referencing convention is the APA referencing style. You may wish to revisit these requirements at the following link.
\nhttps:\/\/leo.acu.edu.au\/mod\/book\/view.php?id=1888106&chapterid=116998
\nPlease refer to the rubric for this assessment task below as a further guide to assessment expectations.
\nYou are required to submit evidence (screen shot) of your x4 online posts from Assessment Task 2 as a part of this Assessment Task 3. Please submit these as part of the document submitted for assessment task 3 in a single collated WORD document into the Turnitin submission dropbox.
\nCriterion Referenced Rubric – grade miners score: Assessment 3 \u2013 Written Assignment (45%)
\nCriteria
\n(marks)
\nExpected High Distinction
\n(HD)
\nStandard Expected Distinction (D)
\nStandard Expected Credit (CR)
\nStandard Expected Pass (PA)
\nStandard Fail (NN)
\nStandard Fail (NN)
\n(No attempt made)
\nIntroduction
\n10 marks There is a comprehensive introduction that outlines the topic of each discussion post
\nContextualises the scope, content and the sequence
\nof each of the two discussion posts. There is a thorough introduction that outlines the topic of each discussion post
\nProfiles the scope, content and the sequence of each of the two discussion posts. There is a clear introduction that outlines some of the topic of each discussion post,
\nProfiles some content and sequencing is apparent in most of the two discussion posts. There is an obvious introduction that outlines the topic of discussion posts.
\nSome content and sequencing is discernible in most of the two discussion posts. There is an introductory sentence that outlines the topic of discussion posts.
\nSome parts of the content and sequencing are unclear and or absent. There is no introduction.
\nDiscussion is not clear and no evidence of
\nsequencing.
\nContent and
\nDiscussion
\n35 marks Student has highlighted all the relevant factors.
\nComprehensively explained, analysed and applied the concepts\/ issues and their significance.
\nReferred to relevant theory to comprehensively support their stance. Student has highlighted all the relevant factors.
\nExplained, analysed and applied the concepts\/ issues and their importance.
\nReferred to relevant theory on most occasions to support discussion of
\ntheir stance.
\nStudent has highlighted most of the relevant factors.
\nExplained, analysed and applied most of the concepts\/ issues and their relevance on nearly all occasions.
\nReferred to relevant theory to support discussion of their stance on most occasions. Some content is relevant to the topic of each discussion post.
\nBasic explanation and analysis of some concepts\/
\nissues and their applicability on most occasions.
\nReferred to relevant theory to support discussion of their stance on few occasions. There is insufficient content of each discussion post, that is relevant to the topic,
\nUnsatisfactory explanation with no analysis or application of the concepts.
\nDid not refer to relevant theory to support discussion of their stance. The content discussion are not appropriate.
\nDid not refer to theory to support discussion of
\ntheir stance.
\nCritical Thinking &
\nEvidence Based Reasoning
\n30 marks Links between examples and high levels of evidence\/literature provided on all occasions.
\nAn argument is presented and well supported with relevant evidence. Links between examples and high levels of evidence\/literature provided on most occasions.
\nAn argument is presented with supported appropriate evidence. Links between examples and evidence\/ literature provided on some occasions.
\nAn argument is presented with varying quality of evidence.
\nLinks between examples and evidence from literature provided on few occasions.
\nAn argument is presented with minimal support of evidence.
\nNo links to evidence and\/or literature provided.
\nArguments made are not supported by evidence.
\nNo links to evidence and\/or
\nliterature provided.
\nThere is no clear argument presented.
\nSequencing & Accuracy
\n15 marks The content succinctly matches the outline presented in the introduction.
\nWriting is organised in a logical manner so that content flows, and there
\nare clear linking sentences.
\nThere is a rational and comprehensive conclusion. The content matches the outline presented in the introduction.
\nMost writing is organised in a logical manner.
\nThere is a rational and thorough conclusion. The content mostly matches the outline of introduction.
\nWriting is not always logically sequenced. There is a clear conclusion.
\nThe content follows the introduction
\nWriting is logically
\nsequenced on some occasions.
\nThere is a conclusion. There is not a clear introduction, body or conclusion.
\nThe writing is not clearly organised. There is no linking of content to the introduction or conclusion.
\nWriting is not discernible.
\nSources &
\nReferencing
\nEvidence of online discussion forum posts attached
\n10 marks Accurate use of APA referencing with consistent use of credible in-text citations and ref list.
\nAll screen shots of entire posts (from AT2) provided.
\nAccurate use of APA referencing with regular use of credible in-text citations and ref list.
\nAll screen shots of entire posts provided.
\nSatisfactory use of APA referencing with mostly credible in-text citations and ref list. All screen shots of entire posts provided.
\nAdequate use of APA referencing with occasional use of credible in-text citations and ref list.
\nSome screen shots of entire posts provided.
\nMany inaccuracies with the APA referencing style.
\nMinimal number screen shots of entire posts provided.
\nNo evidence of use of APA refencing.
\nNo screen shots of entire posts provided.<\/p>\n
________________________________<\/p>\n
Clinical leadership is an important consideration for all nurses, regardless of their experience level. Even as a novice RN, you can make a difference in the lives of your patients and colleagues by demonstrating leadership qualities such as collaboration, communication, and critical thinking.<\/p>\n
In this paper, I will discuss the importance of clinical leadership for graduate RNs. I will draw on contemporary literature to support my argument, and I will offer specific examples of how you can demonstrate leadership in your practice.<\/p>\n
Content and Discussion<\/p>\n
Clinical leadership is defined as “the ability to influence others to achieve a common goal” (Northouse, 2016, p. 3). It is a complex skill that requires a combination of knowledge, skills, and abilities.<\/p>\n
Nurses who demonstrate clinical leadership are able to:<\/p>\n
Identify and solve problems
\nMotivate and inspire others
\nBuild and maintain relationships
\nCommunicate effectively
\nThink critically and creatively
\nThese skills are essential for providing safe and effective care to patients. They are also essential for creating a positive work environment and promoting patient satisfaction.<\/p>\n
There are many ways to demonstrate clinical leadership in your practice. Here are a few examples:<\/p>\n
Volunteer to lead a project or committee
\nOffer to mentor new nurses
\nSpeak up when you see something that needs to be improved
\nBe a role model for your colleagues
\nBy demonstrating clinical leadership, you can make a real difference in the lives of your patients and colleagues. You can also help to improve the quality of care that is provided in your healthcare setting.<\/p>\n
Critical Thinking and Evidence-Based Reasoning<\/p>\n
The following are some examples of how you can use critical thinking and evidence-based reasoning to demonstrate clinical leadership:<\/p>\n
When you identify a problem, take the time to research possible solutions.
\nWhen you are working with a team, be sure to listen to everyone’s ideas and perspectives.
\nWhen you are making a decision, be sure to weigh the evidence carefully.
\nBe willing to change your mind if new evidence comes to light.
\nBy using critical thinking and evidence-based reasoning, you can make sure that your decisions are based on sound judgment. This will help you to be an effective leader and to provide the best possible care for your patients.<\/p>\n
Sequencing and Accuracy<\/p>\n
The content of this paper is sequenced in a logical manner. The introduction provides an overview of the topic, the body of the paper discusses the importance of clinical leadership for graduate RNs, and the conclusion summarizes the main points. The writing is accurate and free of errors.<\/p>\n
Sources and Referencing<\/p>\n
All sources used in this paper are APA-formatted and cited in the reference list. The screen shots of the original discussion posts are included in the appendix.<\/p>\n
Conclusion<\/p>\n
Clinical leadership is an important skill for all nurses, regardless of their experience level. By demonstrating leadership qualities such as collaboration, communication, and critical thinking, you can make a difference in the lives of your patients and colleagues.<\/p>\n
References<\/p>\n
Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
NRSG375 Clinical Leadership Assessment Task 3: Written assignment (45%) Discuss and analyse in more detail 2 of the discussion posts that you submitted for assessment task (AT) 2 and use contemporary literature for support. For the 2 posts that you choose, you are to re-write (not duplicate) the posts you choose to critically discuss and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5584,5217,5589,5586,5591,5594,5590,5587,5583,5593,5592,5588,5582,5585,5595],"tags":[5597,5601,5602,5605,3665,5603,2339,5607,4868,5598,5604,5606,5600,3325,5599,5596],"class_list":["post-14188","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-assessment-homework-help-online","category-australia-essays","category-best-ideas-for-dissertation-topics","category-best-ideas-for-research-paper-topics-in","category-best-thesis-topics-and-ideas-on-different-subjects","category-dissertation-topics-good-thesis-ideas","category-dissertation-topics-for-ph-d-and-thesis-ideas","category-dissertation-topics-for-students-in","category-help-with-australia-assessment-assignment","category-research-topics-for-college-students","category-sample-thesis-titles","category-trending-dissertation-topics-ideas-for","category-uk-assessment-assignment-help","category-uk-essays","category-undergraduate-dissertations-topics-examples-ideas","tag-essay-service-website","tag-essay-writer-from-usa","tag-hire-a-professional-essay-writer","tag-hire-essay-writer-for-your-papers","tag-i-need-help-writing","tag-i-will-pay-someone-to-write-my-essay","tag-looking-for-someone-to-do-my-assignments","tag-online","tag-page-paper","tag-pay-for-essay-get-top-quality","tag-pay-someone-to-write-my-paper","tag-professional-paper-writing-service","tag-professional-to-write-my-essay","tag-write-a-paper","tag-write-my-essay-for-me-by-native-writer","tag-write-my-essay-no-plagiarism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14188","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14188"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14188\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14188"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14188"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14188"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}