Nurs 6052n Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews(Wk4-5)
\nYour quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?
\nIn this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.
\nTo Prepare:
\n\u2022 Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
\n\u2022 Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest for the Assignment.
\n\u2022 Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.
\n\u2022 Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.
\nThe Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
\nPart 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
\nCreate a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
\n\u2022 Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
\n\u2022Page Paper Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
\n\u2022 Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
\n\u2022 Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected.
\n\u2022Page Paper Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.
\n\u2022 Citations must match references. Kindly follow the Instructions and Rubric – grade miners score. It helps.<\/p>\n
RUBRIC
\nPart 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews<\/p>\n
Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:<\/p>\n
\u2022 Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.<\/p>\n
\u2022Page Paper Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected.<\/p>\n
\u2022Page Paper Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples. 81 (81%) \u2013 90 (90%)
\nThe presentation clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail the chosen clinical issue of interest.<\/p>\n
The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail the developed PICO(T) question.<\/p>\n
The presentation clearly and accurately identifies four or more research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected.<\/p>\n
The presentation clearly and accurately provides full APA citations for at least four peer-reviewed articles selected, including a thorough and detailed explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.<\/p>\n
The presentation includes specific and relevant examples that fully support the research.<\/p>\n
The presentation provides a complete, detailed, and accurate synthesis of two outside resources related to the peer-reviewed articles selected, and fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation. 72 (72%) \u2013 80 (80%)
\nThe presentation accurately identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest.<\/p>\n
The presentation accurately describes the developed PICO(T) question focused on the chosen clinical issue of interest.<\/p>\n
The presentation accurately identifies at least four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected.<\/p>\n
The presentation accurately provides APA citations for at least four peer-reviewed articles selected, including an adequate explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.<\/p>\n
The presentation includes relevant examples that support the research presented.<\/p>\n
The presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the peer-reviewed articles selected. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the presentation. 63 (63%) \u2013 71 (71%)
\nThe presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest.<\/p>\n
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) question focused on the chosen clinical issue of interest.<\/p>\n
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies at least four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected.<\/p>\n
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides APA citations for at least four peer-reviewed articles selected, including an inaccurate or vague explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.<\/p>\n
The presentation includes inaccurate or vague examples to support the research presented.<\/p>\n
The presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis or outside resources related to the peer-reviewed articles selected. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation. 0 (0%) \u2013 62 (62%)
\nThe presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest or is missing.<\/p>\n
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) question, or is missing.<\/p>\n
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies less than four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected or is missing.<\/p>\n
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely provides APA citations for at least four peer-reviewed articles selected, including an inaccurate and vague explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research, or is missing.<\/p>\n
The presentation includes inaccurate and vague examples to support the research presented or is missing.<\/p>\n
The presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources related to the articles selected and fails to integrate any resources to support the presentation or is missing.
\nWritten Expression and Format – Best Help Writing My 99 Papers\u2014owl Essay Samplesting\u2014Paragraph Development and Organization:
\nParagraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused\u2014neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria. 5 (5%) \u2013 5 (5%)
\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<\/p>\n
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria. 4 (4%) \u2013 4 (4%)
\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<\/p>\n
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive. 3.5 (3.5%) \u2013 3.5 (3.5%)
\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60\u201379% of the time.<\/p>\n
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. 0 (0%) \u2013 3 (3%)
\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.\n\nNo purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion are provided.\nWritten Expression and Format - Best Help Writing My 99 Papers\u2014owl Essay Samplesting\u2014English Writing Standards:\nCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. 5 (5%) \u2013 5 (5%)\nUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 (4%) \u2013 4 (4%)\nContains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 (3.5%) \u2013 3.5 (3.5%)\nContains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0 (0%) \u2013 3 (3%)\nContains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader\u2019s understanding.\nTotal Points: 100\n\n______________________________-\nNurs 6052n Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews (Weeks 4-5)\n\nExploring Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews\n\nSlide 1: Introduction\n\nWelcome to the presentation on Part 3 of the Evidence-Based Project.\nToday, we'll delve into advanced clinical inquiry and systematic reviews.\nSlide 2: Clinical Issue of Interest\n\nWe'll begin by identifying and describing our chosen clinical issue of interest.\nOur clinical issue is [describe your chosen clinical issue briefly].\nSlide 3: Developing a PICO(T) Question\n\nNext, let's discuss the development of a PICO(T) question.\nOur PICO(T) question focused on the clinical issue is [present your PICO(T) question].\nSlide 4: Research Databases Used\n\nTo gather evidence, we conducted searches in various research databases.\nThe four research databases used for our search are [list the four research databases].\nSlide 5: APA Citations of Selected Articles\n\nHere are the APA citations for the four peer-reviewed articles we selected:\n[APA citation for article 1]\n[APA citation for article 2]\n[APA citation for article 3]\n[APA citation for article 4]\nSlide 6: Levels of Evidence and Systematic Reviews\n\nLet's discuss the levels of evidence found in the selected articles and the strengths of systematic reviews.\nIn Article 1, the evidence level is [identify the evidence level], and it provides [mention a strength with an example].\nArticle 2 offers [mention evidence level] evidence and [strength with an example].\nArticle 3 presents [mention evidence level] evidence and [strength with an example].\nLastly, Article 4 includes [mention evidence level] evidence and [strength with an example].\nSystematic reviews are valuable due to [mention a few strengths with examples].\nSlide 7: Conclusion\n\nIn conclusion, we've explored our clinical issue, developed a focused PICO(T) question, identified research databases, provided APA citations, and discussed evidence levels and systematic reviews.\nThis presentation emphasizes the significance of evidence-based practice in clinical research.\nSlide 8: References\n\nList all references used in APA format.\nOverall:\n\nThe presentation comprehensively addresses each aspect of the rubric, including the clinical issue, PICO(T) question, research databases, APA citations, evidence levels, and systematic reviews.\nParagraphs are well-structured, clear, and logically organized.\nThe writing adheres to proper grammar, mechanics, and punctuation rules.\n(- - Note: The number of slides in your presentation may vary based on your specific content, but this template provides a general framework to follow.)\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Nurs 6052n Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews(Wk4-5) Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5584,5217,5589,5586,5591,5594,5590,5587,5583,5593,5592,5588,5582,5585,5595],"tags":[5597,5601,5602,5605,3665,5603,2339,5607,4868,5598,5604,5606,5600,3325,5599,5596],"class_list":["post-14894","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-assessment-homework-help-online","category-australia-essays","category-best-ideas-for-dissertation-topics","category-best-ideas-for-research-paper-topics-in","category-best-thesis-topics-and-ideas-on-different-subjects","category-dissertation-topics-good-thesis-ideas","category-dissertation-topics-for-ph-d-and-thesis-ideas","category-dissertation-topics-for-students-in","category-help-with-australia-assessment-assignment","category-research-topics-for-college-students","category-sample-thesis-titles","category-trending-dissertation-topics-ideas-for","category-uk-assessment-assignment-help","category-uk-essays","category-undergraduate-dissertations-topics-examples-ideas","tag-essay-service-website","tag-essay-writer-from-usa","tag-hire-a-professional-essay-writer","tag-hire-essay-writer-for-your-papers","tag-i-need-help-writing","tag-i-will-pay-someone-to-write-my-essay","tag-looking-for-someone-to-do-my-assignments","tag-online","tag-page-paper","tag-pay-for-essay-get-top-quality","tag-pay-someone-to-write-my-paper","tag-professional-paper-writing-service","tag-professional-to-write-my-essay","tag-write-a-paper","tag-write-my-essay-for-me-by-native-writer","tag-write-my-essay-no-plagiarism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14894","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14894"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14894\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14894"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14894"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14894"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}