HPRO6715 Foundations of Health Promotion Assignment 1B.
\nThis assignment follows directly on from Assignment 1A. In Assignment 1B, you use the same health promotion goal and the same two papers you selected in Assignment 1A. You should not select a different health promotion goal or change the papers you selected to complete Assignment 1B.
\nIn Assignment 1B, you continue to critically examine the two interventions you selected in Assignment 1A
\nHPRO6715 Foundations of Health Promotion Assignment 1B.
\nQuestion 1.
\nState the topic you selected from the list provided
\nProvide the full citation details for the paper selected (Paper 1)
\nSimply copy and paste the text\/screenshot of the complete abstract here \u2013 no editing is required. Do not worry about the effect this will have on your Turnitin score. This is not plagiarism and you will not be penalised for that.
\nQuestion 1.1. Reflecting on each of the following three principles of best practice for health promotion, 1) \u201cEvidence-based Practice\u201d, 2) \u201cA commitment to equity\u201d, and 3) \u201cPlanning for sustainability\u201d describe whether the selected intervention in your paper addresses this principle and why you believe this is the case. Support your position on how it reflects each principle with relevant citations. The length of your response to each principle is to be 150 words \u00b1 10%.
\nQuestion 1.2. For the intervention you selected, describe the intervention in terms of the 1)
\n\u201cSources of Behaviour\u201d, 2) \u201cIntervention Functions\u201d, and 3) \u201cPolicy Categories\u201d from the Behaviour Change Wheel1. The length of your response to each component of the intervention is to be 150 words \u00b1 10%.
\nQUESTION 2 (ABOUT PAPER 2)
\nState the topic you selected from the list provided
\nProvide the full citation details for the paper selected (Paper 2)
\nSimply copy and paste the text\/screenshot of the complete abstract here \u2013 no editing is required. Do not worry about the effect this will have on your Turnitin score. This is not plagiarism and you will not be penalised for that.
\nQuestion 2.1. Reflecting on each of the following three principles of best practice for health promotion, 1) \u201cEvidence-based Practice\u201d, 2) \u201cA commitment to equity\u201d, and 3) \u201cPlanning for sustainability\u201d describe whether the selected intervention in your paper addresses this principle and why you believe this is the case. Support your position on how it reflects each principle with relevant citations. The length of your response to each principle is to be 150 words \u00b1 10%.
\nQuestion 2.2. For the intervention you selected, describe the intervention in terms of the 1)
\n\u201cSources of Behaviour\u201d, 2) \u201cIntervention Functions\u201d, and 3) \u201cPolicy Categories\u201d from the Behaviour Change Wheel1. The length of your response to each component of the intervention is to be 150 words \u00b1 10%.
\nQUESTION 3
\nReferring back to the health promotion goal you selected in Assignment 1A and reflecting on the responses you made to questions 1 and 2 above answer the following question. Which of the two interventions you selected do you think has the potential to have the greatest impact on the health promotion goal, and why? The length of your response is to be 400 words \u00b1 10%.
\nReferences
\n1. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science. 2011\/04\/23 2011;6(1):42. doi:10.1186\/1748-5908-6-42
\nAssignment 1B: Marking Rubric – grade miners score
\n====
\nQuestion 1: Paper 1<\/p>\n
Homework Help – Topic: Increasing Physical Activity in Older Adults<\/p>\n
Paper 1: Bauman, A., Bellew, B., Owen, N., Vita, P., & Brown, W. (2002). Getting Australia Moving: A report on physical activity from the National Public Health Partnership. Australian and New Zealand Page Essay – Journal of Public Health, 26(3), 240-245. doi: 10.1111\/j.1467-842X.2002.tb00684.x<\/p>\n
Abstract:<\/p>\n
Objective: To summarise the recent evidence on physical activity and health and to provide recommendations on the promotion of physical activity for health benefits.<\/p>\n
Methods: A review of the literature and data from surveys of physical activity levels among Australians and of interventions designed to increase physical activity.<\/p>\n
Results: Physical activity reduces the risk of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes and some cancers. Physical inactivity causes as many deaths in Australia as smoking. Most Australians are insufficiently active for health benefits. There is evidence for effective interventions to increase physical activity at the individual and population levels.<\/p>\n
Conclusions: Physical activity should be promoted to the general public as an important means of reducing chronic disease risk. The challenge for health promotion is to promote population-wide increases in physical activity in the face of environmental and social factors that discourage it.<\/p>\n
Question 1.1:<\/p>\n
Evidence-based Practice: The selected intervention in Paper 1 addresses the principle of evidence-based practice. The paper presents evidence that physical activity reduces the risk of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes, and some cancers. The authors provide recommendations for promoting physical activity for health benefits based on a review of the literature and data from surveys of physical activity levels among Australians and of interventions designed to increase physical activity. They also highlight the need for effective interventions to increase physical activity at the individual and population levels, based on the available evidence (Bauman et al., 2002).<\/p>\n
A commitment to equity: The selected intervention in Paper 1 addresses the principle of a commitment to equity. The authors note that most Australians are insufficiently active for health benefits, and that there are environmental and social factors that discourage physical activity. They recommend that physical activity be promoted to the general public as an important means of reducing chronic disease risk. To achieve population-wide increases in physical activity, they suggest that interventions should be targeted towards
\n===
\nQuestion 1.1 Fail
\nPass Satisfactory Credit Good Distinction Excellent High Distinction
\nOutstanding
\nCriteria 0-3 4-7 8-11 12-15 16-20
\nCritical analysis of the intervention in relation to the stated principles of health promotion \u2022 Links to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks not made
\n\u2022 Information provided not linked to the set tasks
\n\u2022 Highlights relevance for none\/few very principles \u2022 Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks that are satisfactory
\n\u2022 Information provided with some
\nlinks to the set tasks
\n\u2022 Highlights relevance for few principles \u2022 Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks that are somewhat clear
\n\u2022 Information provided somewhat linked to the set tasks
\n\u2022 Highlights relevance for several principles \u2022 Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks that are mostly clear
\n\u2022 Information provided mostly linked to the set tasks
\n\u2022 Highlights relevance for majority but not all principles \u2022 Demonstrates outstanding knowledge of relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks in understanding the topic
\n\u2022 Information provided clearly linked to the set tasks
\n\u2022 Highlights relevance for all principles
\n0-3 4-7 8-11 12-15 16-20
\nUnderstanding of how interventions target the stated principles of health promotion \u2022 Demonstrates little ability to critique selected interventions and the relevance of intervention components to none\/few very of the principles of health promotion \u2022 Demonstrates
\nsatisfactory ability to critique selected interventions and the relevance of intervention
\ncomponents to few of the principles of health promotion \u2022 Somewhat clear in the critiques of selected interventions and the relevance of intervention components to several of the
\nprinciples of health promotion
\n\u2022 Mostly clear in the critiques of selected interventions and the relevance of intervention components to majority of the
\nprinciples of health promotion
\n\u2022 Demonstrates outstanding ability to critique selected interventions and the relevance of intervention components to all of the
\nprinciples of health promotion
\n0-1 2-3 4-5 6-7 8-10
\nWriting style \u2022 Responses are not within word limits
\n(\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Poorly written, with limited use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources \u2022 Some responses are within word limits
\n(\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Reasonably well written, with some use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources
\n\u2022 \u2022 Few responses are within word limits (\u00b1~10%) with some clearly above\/below
\n\u2022 Adequately well written, with good use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources \u2022 Responses are mostly within word limits
\n(\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Mostly well written, with excellent use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources \u2022 Responses are consistently within word limits (\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Very well written, with outstanding use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources
\nQuestion 1.2
\nCriteria 0-6 7-14 15-23 24-31 32-40
\nCritical analysis of the intervention in relation to the sources of behaviour, intervention functions, & policy categories of the behaviour change wheel \u2022 Makes no\/few links to the factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks
\n\u2022 Makes no\/few links to information articulating what the target behaviour is, how the intervention \u2022 Where appropriate makes links to the factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks that are satisfactory
\n\u2022 Provides satisfactory information articulating what the target behaviour is, how the intervention \u2022 Where appropriate makes links to the factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks
\nthat are somewhat clear
\n\u2022 Is somewhat clear in articulating what the target behaviour is, how the intervention aims to achieve \u2022 Where appropriate makes links to the factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks that are mostly clear
\n\u2022 Is mostly clear in articulating what the target behaviour is, how the intervention aims to achieve change in target in \u2022 Demonstrates outstanding knowledge and understanding of factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks
\n\u2022 Demonstrates outstanding ability to clearly articulate the target behaviour, how the intervention aims to achieve change in target
\naims to achieve change in target in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks aims to achieve change in target in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks change in target in relation to relevant guidelines, theories,
\nand\/or frameworks
\nrelation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks
\n0-1 2-3 4-5 6-7 8-10
\nWriting style \u2022 Responses are not within word limits
\n(\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Poorly written, with limited use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources \u2022 Some responses are within word limits
\n(\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Reasonably well written, with some use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources
\n\u2022 Few responses are within word limits (\u00b1~10%) with some clearly above\/below
\n\u2022 Adequately well written, with good use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources \u2022 Responses are mostly within word limits
\n(\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Mostly well written, with excellent use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources \u2022 Responses are consistently within word limits (\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Very well written, with outstanding use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources
\nQuestion 2.1
\nCriteria \u2022 0-3 \u2022 4-7 \u2022 8-11 \u2022 12-15 \u2022 16-20
\nCritical analysis of the intervention in relation to the stated principles of health promotion \u2022 Links to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks not made
\n\u2022 Information provided not linked to the set tasks
\n\u2022 Highlights relevance for \u2022 Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks that are satisfactory
\n\u2022 Information provided with some
\nlinks to the set tasks \u2022 Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks that are somewhat clear
\n\u2022 Information provided somewhat linked to the set tasks \u2022 Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks that are mostly clear
\n\u2022 Information provided mostly linked to the
\nset tasks \u2022 Demonstrates outstanding knowledge of relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks in understanding the topic
\n\u2022 Information provided clearly linked to the set tasks
\nnone\/few very principles \u2022 Highlights relevance for few principles \u2022 Highlights relevance for several principles \u2022 Highlights relevance for majority but not all principles \u2022 Highlights relevance for all principles
\n\u2022 0-3 \u2022 4-7 \u2022 8-11 \u2022 12-15 \u2022 16-20
\nUnderstanding of how interventions target the stated principles of health promotion \u2022 Demonstrates little ability to critique selected interventions and the relevance of intervention components to none\/few very of the principles of health promotion \u2022 Demonstrates
\nsatisfactory ability to critique selected interventions and the relevance of intervention
\ncomponents to few of the principles of health promotion
\n\u2022 \u2022 Somewhat clear in the critiques of selected interventions and the relevance of intervention components to several of the principles of health promotion
\n\u2022 \u2022 Mostly clear in the critiques of selected interventions and the relevance of intervention components to majority of the principles of health promotion
\n\u2022 \u2022 Demonstrates outstanding ability to critique selected interventions and the relevance of intervention components to all of the
\nprinciples of health promotion
\n\u2022
\n\u2022 0-1 \u2022 2-3 \u2022 4-5 \u2022 6-7 \u2022 8-10
\nWriting style \u2022 Responses are not within word limits
\n(\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Poorly written, with limited use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources \u2022 Some responses are within word limits
\n(\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Reasonably well written, with some use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources \u2022 Few responses are within word limits (\u00b1~10%) with some clearly above\/below
\n\u2022 Adequately well written, with good use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources \u2022 Responses are mostly within word limits
\n(\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Mostly well written, with excellent use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources \u2022 Responses are consistently within word limits (\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Very well written, with outstanding use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources
\nQuestion 2.2
\nCriteria \u2022 0-6 \u2022 7-14 \u2022 15-23 \u2022 24-31 \u2022 32-40
\nCritical analysis of the intervention in relation to the sources of behaviour, intervention functions, & policy categories of the behaviour change wheel \u2022 Makes no\/few links to the factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks
\n\u2022 Makes no\/few links to information articulating what the target behaviour is, how the intervention aims to achieve change in target in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks \u2022 Where appropriate makes links to the factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks that are satisfactory
\n\u2022 Provides satisfactory information articulating what the target behaviour is, how the intervention aims to achieve change in target in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks \u2022 Where appropriate makes links to the factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks that are somewhat clear
\n\u2022 Is somewhat clear in articulating what the target behaviour is, how the intervention aims to achieve change in target in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks
\n\u2022 \u2022 Where appropriate makes links to the factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks that are mostly clear
\n\u2022 Is mostly clear in articulating what the target behaviour is, how the intervention aims to achieve change in target in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks \u2022 Demonstrates outstanding knowledge and understanding of factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks
\n\u2022 Demonstrates outstanding ability to clearly articulate the target behaviour, how the intervention aims to achieve change in target in relation to relevant
\nguidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks
\n\u2022 0-1 \u2022 2-3 \u2022 4-5 \u2022 6-7 \u2022 8-10
\nWriting style \u2022 Responses are not within word limits
\n(\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Poorly written, with limited use of peer-reviewed evidence and \u2022 Some responses are within word limits
\n(\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Reasonably well written, with some use of peerreviewed evidence \u2022 Few responses are within word limits (\u00b1~10%) with some clearly above\/below
\n\u2022 Adequately well written, with good use of peer-reviewed \u2022 Responses are mostly within word limits
\n(\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Mostly well written, with excellent use of peer-reviewed \u2022 Responses are consistently within word limits (\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Very well written, with outstanding use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources
\nother reliable sources and other reliable sources
\nevidence and other reliable sources evidence and other reliable sources
\nQuestion 3
\nCriteria \u2022 0-3 \u2022 4-7 \u2022 8-11 \u2022 12-15 \u2022 16-20
\nCritical analysis of the interventions to achieve aims \u2022 Demonstrates little understanding of strengths & weakness of intervention to achieve aims
\n\u2022 Issues identified not relevant\/ limited relevance to intervention aim, intervention functions, spectrum of health promotion interventions,
\nlevels of prevention \u2022 Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of strengths & weakness of intervention to achieve aims
\n\u2022 Issues identified relevant to intervention aim, intervention functions, spectrum of health promotion interventions, levels of prevention \u2022 Demonstrates good understanding of strengths & weakness of intervention to achieve aims
\n\u2022 Issues identified somewhat relevant to intervention aim, intervention functions, spectrum of health promotion interventions, levels of prevention \u2022 Demonstrates mostly clear understanding of strengths & weakness of intervention to achieve aims
\n\u2022 Issues identified relevant to most but not all intervention aim, intervention functions, spectrum of health promotion interventions, levels of prevention \u2022 Demonstrates outstanding understanding of strengths & weakness of intervention to achieve aims
\n\u2022 Issues identified highly relevant to all intervention aim, intervention functions, spectrum of health promotion interventions, levels of prevention
\n0-3 4-7 8-11 12-15 16-20
\nCritical analysis of intervention
\nin relation to impact \u2022 Demonstrates
\nlittle
\nunderstanding of strengths & weakness of \u2022 Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of strengths & weakness of \u2022 Demonstrates good understanding of strengths & weakness of intervention to achieve aims. \u2022 Demonstrates mostly clear understanding of strengths & weakness of intervention to achieve aims. \u2022 Demonstrates outstanding understanding of strengths & weakness of
\nintervention to achieve aims.
\n\u2022 Issues identified not relevant\/ limited relevance to intervention aim
\n\u2022 Links to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks not made intervention to achieve aims.
\n\u2022 Issues identified relevant to intervention aim
\n\u2022 Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks that are satisfactory \u2022 Issues identified somewhat relevant to intervention aim
\n\u2022 Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks that are somewhat clear \u2022 Issues identified relevant to intervention aim
\n\u2022 Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks that are mostly clear intervention to achieve aims.
\n\u2022 Issues identified highly relevant to intervention aim
\n\u2022 Demonstrates outstanding knowledge of relevant guidelines, theories, and\/or frameworks in understanding the topic
\n\u2022 0-1 \u2022 2-3 \u2022 4-5 \u2022 6-7 \u2022 8-10
\nWriting style \u2022 Responses are not within word limits
\n(\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Poorly written, with limited use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources \u2022 Some responses are within word limits
\n(\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Reasonably well written, with some use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources \u2022 Few responses are within word limits (\u00b1~10%) with some clearly above\/below
\n\u2022 Adequately well written, with good use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources \u2022 Responses are mostly within word limits
\n(\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Mostly well written, with excellent use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources \u2022 Responses are consistently within word limits (\u00b1~10%)
\n\u2022 Very well written, with outstanding use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
HPRO6715 Foundations of Health Promotion Assignment 1B. This assignment follows directly on from Assignment 1A. In Assignment 1B, you use the same health promotion goal\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5616,5610,5241,5243,4206,5239,5612,5240,5615,5617,5608,5618,5613,5609,5242,5244,5614,5611],"tags":[5621,2336,5623,5624,689,4067,1787,5285,5619,5620,5604,5225,5622],"class_list":["post-15770","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-can-someone-do-my-homework","category-case-study-answers-examples","category-custom-essay","category-dissertation-topic","category-free-essays","category-help-in-assignment","category-help-of-a-essay-writing-service","category-help-with-class","category-i-need-help-with-my-homework","category-ill-pay-someone-to-do-my-hw","category-online-essay-writing-service","category-order-cheap-essay-online","category-pay-to-write-essay","category-professional-paper-writing-help-service","category-term-paper","category-thesis-writers","category-write-essay-online","category-write-my-essay-for-me-online","tag-app-for-college-students-essays","tag-assignment-helper-for-students","tag-buy-essay-online-from-pro-essay-writers","tag-essay-example","tag-i-need-help-with-my-homework","tag-i-need-help-writing-an-essay","tag-in-a-page-paper","tag-in-a-word-essay","tag-order-an-essay-online-from-top-quality-writers","tag-paper-writing-service-with-good-writers","tag-pay-someone-to-write-my-paper","tag-write-a-page-assignment","tag-write-my-essay-with-top-writers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15770","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15770"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15770\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15770"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15770"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15770"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}