Week 11
\n20 working days after deadline (L4, 5 and 7)
\n15 working days after deadline (L6)
\n10 working days after deadline (block delivery)
\nClick or tap to enter a date.
\nUnit title & code
\nBSS045-3 Specialist Project (Dissertation)
\nAssignment number and title
\nAssignment 2 Final Report
\nAssignment type
\nWR-I
\nWeighting of assignment
\n80%
\nSize or length of assessment
\n8,000 words (+\/- 10%)
\nUnit learning outcomes
\n1. Demonstrate understanding of the research process in the context of your chosen business-related specialist project
\n2. To develop, plan and implement a valid and academically reliable research-based project<\/p>\n
What am I required to do in this assignment?
\nYou are required to produce an individual dissertation based on your own research. This must be a fully referenced, researched and academically valid and reliable (Specialist Project) dissertation (8,000 words).
\nThe dissertation must develop the ideas from your proposal based on your further research, supervisor feedback and discussions. You cannot resubmit previously submitted work.
\nDetailed guidance on each section will be given week by week in class. The work must be your own and you must use the general structure to each section detailed within the Masterclass teaching.
\nLayout of the final Report (the dissertation)
\nThe word count of the final report should be 8,000 words (+\/- 10%). The layout of most projects should follow a standard structure:
\n\u2022 University header page (BREO template provided)
\n\u2022 Your name
\n\u2022 The date
\n\u2022 The name of the course
\n\u2022 The name of the department and University
\n\u2022 Any statements of confidentiality (page ii).
\n\u2022 Abstract (max 250 words) Not included in word count
\n\u2022 The stated aims and objectives
\n\u2022 What it looked at (the business problems)
\n\u2022 How it looked at it (research methods, concepts, models)
\n\u2022 What was found
\n\u2022 The limitations of the research
\n\u2022 What conclusions can be drawn, and recommendations made.
\n\u2022 List of Contents
\n\u2022 List of Figures and\/or Tables (if applicable)
\n\u2022 Introduction (Max 1,000 words)
\n\u2022 The detailed aims and objectives
\n\u2022 Identification of the business problem
\n\u2022 What the report intends to achieve
\n\u2022 The conceptual\/theoretical framework to be used
\n\u2022 Any definition of terms (if no Glossary)
\n\u2022 The general methodology to be used in the investigation
\n\u2022 Background history, if necessary
\n\u2022 Literature Review (Max 2,000 words)
\n\u2022 Methodology (Max 1,800 words)
\n\u2022 Findings\/Analysis\/Discussion (Max 2,000 words)
\n\u2022 Conclusions (Max 500 words)
\n\u2022 Reflection (Max 700 words) Please note this should be reflective not descriptive
\nYour reflection must be based on the process of your report development; what you have learned, your ability to relate theory to practice. How your skills have developed, your ability to relate the dissertation learning to your future career path.
\n\u2022 References (and Bibliography – Top Bridge Essays UK Writings Service- Homework Help With Writing Assignment – Bibliography – Top Bridge Essays UK Writings Serviceif appropriate)
\n\u2022 Appendices
\nWhat do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations from UIF)
\nSubmit your work through BREO by the deadline required
\n\u2022 To have received ethics committee approval
\n\u2022 Demonstrate sufficient understanding of the process of carrying out a research project by completing all the chapters of the dissertation
\n\u2022 Demonstrate appropriate understanding of your chosen project evidenced by literature review, data analysis and discussion
\n\u2022 Demonstrate the ability to develop, plan and implement an academically valid and reliable project by designing a robust research methodology and then carrying out and reporting on the research
\n\u2022 Evidence critical reasoning using Harvard style of referencing
\n– – Note (1): All students must have submitted, and had approved, an ethics form before they can start research. Research carried out \/ submitted without ethics approval will not be marked.
\n– – Note (2): Turnitin will be used for all submissions to check for plagiarism. We also reserve the right to initiate a viva voce examination if we have concerns regarding the originality of your submission. You need to be available for a viva if called following the submission of your work. Non-attendance counts as non-submission.
\n– – Note (3): all raw data must be included in your appendix
\nHow do I produce high quality work that merits a good grade?
\nWe will be filling this section in together in class on week 4: make sure you have downloaded\/printed out the Assignment Brief – Need Best of The Academic Papers UK Dissertation Writers and bring it to the session with you.
\nHow does this assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions?
\nThe unit is based on independent study, requiring you to be responsible for the management and direction of the research, project supervisors are assigned to oversee and guide you through the process. The proposed topic is agreed by yourself and respective supervisors and should relate to a specific Business Management issue as well as being of interest to you.
\nThe supervisor-supervisee relationship is managed by you, and you are provided with the opportunity for 4-hour individual contact with your supervisor over the dissertation process. You drive the project with the supervisor acting as a support mechanism.
\nA one-hour master class is provided via the local tutor that addresses issues that are relevant to all students. Broadly topics covered may include:
\n? Identifying topics
\n? Literature Review
\n? Academic Writing
\n? Research Design
\n? Qualitative data analysis
\n? Quantitative Data Analysis
\nHow will my assignment be marked?
\nYour assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page.
\nYou can use them to evaluate your own work and consider your grade before you submit.
\n3rd Class \u2013 40-49%
\nLower 2nd \u2013 50-59%
\nUpper 2nd \u2013 60-69%
\n1st Class \u2013 70%+
\nDepth of Research; Establishing the context
\n20% \u2022 Ethics approval granted
\n\u2022 The dissertation has all the required components as listed in the assignment brief.
\n\u2022 Ethics approval granted
\n\u2022 The dissertation has all the required components as listed in the assignment brief. In particular, the context is well-established, and the aim and objectives are mainly focused and critical \u2022 Ethics approval granted
\n\u2022 The dissertation has all the required components as listed in the assignment brief. There is a good context clearly explained with well-focused and critical aim \/ objectives which are used to support the project \u2022 Ethics approval granted
\n\u2022 The dissertation has all the required components as listed in the assignment brief and the context is developed to excellent standard that is in-depth and thorough. The aim and objectives are focused, critical and used as a project framework throughout project
\nLiterature review and the full dissertation research process
\n30%
\n\u2022 Sufficient understanding of the process of carrying out a research project is demonstrated by clearly completing all the chapters of the dissertation.
\n\u2022 A sound understanding of the process of carrying out a research project is demonstrated by clearly completing all the chapters of the dissertation. There is sound evidence of research and an appropriate use of empirical and academic (not third party) journals. The research is relevant to the aims \/ objectives and current and there is a sound attempt at data analysis. The discussion clearly looks to answer project objectives. \u2022 A good level of understanding of the process of carrying out a research project is demonstrated by clearly completing all the chapters of the dissertation. There is evidence of good research which is relevant to aim and objectives; it defines the topic well and accurately. The research makes good use of academic and empirical sources and there are clear attempts to critically review the literature in relation to the topic. There is good data analysis and clear links between data, research and LR. There is a good discussion that critically looks to answer the objectives in relation to data research and LR
\n\u2022 An excellent understanding of the process of carrying out a research project is demonstrated by clearly completing all the chapters of the dissertation. The research is well-articulated and critical and is focused on critically reviewing existing knowledge specifically in relation to the project topic. There is excellent data analysis and explicit and focused links between objectives, data and LR. The discussion is excellent, focused and critical and explicitly answers the objectives in relation to data research and LR
\nMethodology, findings, data analysis, conclusions. Have they met the original aim\/objectives
\n30% \u2022 Ethics approval granted
\n\u2022 Some evidence of research design but methodology has significant flaws
\n\u2022 Clear evidence of individual research
\n\u2022 The data generated has interest but may be ad hoc or be irrelevant in places;
\n\u2022 The conclusions are weakly substantiated
\n\u2022 Ethics approval granted
\n\u2022 An attempt to a coherent research design with relevant methods
\n\u2022 Data generated is of reasonable quality and has reasonable validity and\/or reliability
\n\u2022 Discussion links findings to LR
\n\u2022 Partially relevant conclusions are presented that are supported through evidence.
\n\u2022 Ethics approval granted
\n\u2022 Good, sensible research design and a logical choice of methods.
\n\u2022 Issues of reliability\/validity well addressed.
\n\u2022 The data is useful, valid and reliable
\n\u2022 The discussion links results to LR and there is evidence of relevant methodological limitations \/ further research
\n\u2022 Conclusions meet objectives of dissertation \u2022 Ethics approval granted
\n\u2022 The research design is well\u2014developed, insightful and thorough
\n\u2022 Data provided is valuable and insightful.
\n\u2022 The discussion links insightfully the results to the LR
\n\u2022 The discussion links results to LR and there is excellent understanding of relevant methodological limitations \/ further research
\n\u2022 Conclusions are original and answer well the objectives providing new insights
\nHarvard referencing, language, Reflection and Critical Thinking
\n20%
\n\u2022 There is clear evidence of critical reasoning using Harvard style of referencing.
\n\u2022 Sources are largely appropriate (not internet sources) and there are clear attempts to format references correctly.
\n\u2022 There is a clear attempt to demonstrate learning from the research process through the use of the reflection. Clear linking of the dissertation process to your future career \u2022 There is clear, consistent and sound evidence of critical reasoning using Harvard style of referencing. Sources are of an appropriate quality, with clear evidence of engagement with the literature. Ideas are expressed in own words and accurately referenced.
\n\u2022 There is a soundly demonstrated understanding of the iterative nature of research through the use of the reflection. A sound effort to relate the learning to real life and your future professional career. \u2022 The evidence of critical reasoning using Harvard style of referencing is good and there is clearly a good understanding of the use of references to support the development and discussion of ideas and explore existing knowledge. The format and language are good.
\n\u2022 There is good reliable evidence of learning from mistakes and understanding the iterative nature of research through the use of the reflection. The Reflection connects theory and practice and the ability to link learning to own career.
\n\u2022 The evidence of critical reasoning using Harvard style of referencing is excellent with minimal mistakes. Excellent quality and appropriate references are used throughout and there is an excellent, well-designed format with a similarly high standard in the use of English language to critically explore ideas.
\n\u2022 The ability to learn and understanding the iterative process of research demonstrated to an excellent standard with strong application of theory to practice, and the ability to relate the dissertation to the professional career<\/p>\n
What is the deadline for Assignment 2 Final Report in the unit BSS045-3 Specialist Project (Dissertation)? What is the word count for the final report, and what is the required format for the report? How will the assignment be marked?<\/p>\n
The deadline for Assignment 2 Final Report in the unit BSS045-3 Specialist Project (Dissertation) is 20 working days after the deadline for L4, L5, and L7, 15 working days after the deadline for L6, and 10 working days after the deadline for block delivery. The word count for the final report should be 8,000 words (+\/- 10%). The report should follow a standard structure, including a university header page, abstract, introduction, literature review, methodology, findings\/analysis\/discussion, conclusions, reflection, references (and bibliography if appropriate), and appendices. The assignment is weighted 80% and will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria provided in the unit. The criteria include depth of research, critical reasoning, understanding of the research process, development, planning, and implementation of a valid and academically reliable research-based project. The grading system is as follows: 3rd Class (40-49%), Lower 2nd (50-59%), Upper 2nd (60-69%), and 1st Class (70%+).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Week 11 20 working days after deadline (L4, 5 and 7) 15 working days after deadline (L6) 10 working days after deadline (block delivery) Click\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5616,5610,5241,5243,4206,5239,5612,5240,5615,5617,5608,5618,5613,5609,5242,5244,5614,5611],"tags":[5621,2336,5623,5624,689,4067,1787,5285,5619,5620,5604,5225,5622],"class_list":["post-15777","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-can-someone-do-my-homework","category-case-study-answers-examples","category-custom-essay","category-dissertation-topic","category-free-essays","category-help-in-assignment","category-help-of-a-essay-writing-service","category-help-with-class","category-i-need-help-with-my-homework","category-ill-pay-someone-to-do-my-hw","category-online-essay-writing-service","category-order-cheap-essay-online","category-pay-to-write-essay","category-professional-paper-writing-help-service","category-term-paper","category-thesis-writers","category-write-essay-online","category-write-my-essay-for-me-online","tag-app-for-college-students-essays","tag-assignment-helper-for-students","tag-buy-essay-online-from-pro-essay-writers","tag-essay-example","tag-i-need-help-with-my-homework","tag-i-need-help-writing-an-essay","tag-in-a-page-paper","tag-in-a-word-essay","tag-order-an-essay-online-from-top-quality-writers","tag-paper-writing-service-with-good-writers","tag-pay-someone-to-write-my-paper","tag-write-a-page-assignment","tag-write-my-essay-with-top-writers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15777","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15777"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15777\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15777"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15777"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15777"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}