Advanced Project Management<\/p>\n
Client selected \u2022 Comparing & Contrasting Burj Khalifa Dubai (& The Shard UK design and build)<\/p>\n
Your job for this assignment is to analyse and critique the success or failure of the project specifically in terms of its project management capability and to tell us what you have learned from this. For example, Burj Khalifa was an engineering success story but, as a project, can it, and should it, be seen as successful? In this particular case how does it compare to \u2018The Shard\u2019 in its approach to development and construction techniques. Do not get distracted by detail of the engineering processes or technical design. These may be important but your focus MUST be on the application of the project management process throughout the project\u2019s lifecycle. Specifically, analyse the case\u2019s approach to risk management and stakeholder management. You will draw on the perspectives of project management best practice and academic literature and demonstrate your understanding of how the case does or does not reflect this best practice. The tasks and marking criteria are as follows: <\/p>\n
1.\tDiscuss and critique the project team\u2019s approach to the management of project risk (20%)<\/p>\n
2.<\/p>\n
3.<\/p>\n
4.<\/p>\n
5.<\/p>\n
This is an individual report and should be approximately 3,500 words, not including references, diagrams, tables, appendices and headings.
\nModule Title:<\/p>\n
Advanced Project Management
\nAdvanced project management refers to the use of advanced techniques and tools to effectively manage complex projects. These techniques and tools are designed to help project managers plan, execute, and control projects with a higher level of precision and accuracy.<\/p>\n
Some examples of advanced project management techniques and tools include:<\/p>\n
Earned value management: This technique helps project managers track the progress of a project and compare it to the project plan. It involves measuring the value of work completed and comparing it to the planned value of the work.<\/p>\n
Six Sigma: This methodology involves using data and statistical analysis to identify and eliminate defects in processes. It can be applied to project management to help improve efficiency and reduce waste.<\/p>\n
Agile project management: This approach involves using iterative and incremental development to manage projects. It emphasizes flexibility and the ability to adapt to change.<\/p>\n
– . using these advanced techniques and tools, project managers can more effectively manage complex projects and increase the chances of project success.
\nModule summary
\nMastering project management is crucial to organisations in the 21st century. Recognising the importance of both tools and techniques as well as human and organisational factors in achieving project success, the module enables students to learn the \u2018hard\u2019 science essential for project managers today, but with the crucial emphasis on the soft skills involved in managing people and change in order to help achieve delivery of successful projects.
\nEffective project management involves a combination of both hard skills, such as the ability to use specific tools and techniques, and soft skills, such as the ability to communicate effectively and lead a team. Hard skills are important because they help project managers plan, execute, and control projects effectively. These skills include the ability to create project schedules, allocate resources, track progress, and identify and mitigate risks.
\nSoft skills, on the other hand, are focused on the interpersonal aspects of project management. These skills involve the ability to communicate clearly and effectively, build and maintain relationships with team members and stakeholders, and lead and motivate a team.
\nIn order to be an effective project manager, it is important to have a balance of both hard and soft skills. – . mastering both, project managers can effectively plan, execute, and control projects while also being able to lead and motivate their teams and effectively communicate with stakeholders
\nThrough extensive case study analysis, and with insight from current research, you will evaluate the role of the project manager in today\u2019s workplace and critically review the rise of the project-centric organisation in a global context. Relating theory to practical reality in the light of the current research, you will understand new best practice in project management and how it impacts organisations seeking to run effective projects, both locally and across international borders.<\/p>\n
Learning objectives
\n1.\tKnowledge outcomes \u2013 you will be able to demonstrate a critical understanding of the skills and competencies needed by project managers and selectively apply the relevant tools and techniques available to address challenges and solve problems involved in managing complex international projects, in line with organisations\u2019 strategic direction.
\n2.\tCognitive skills outcomes \u2013 you will be able to create, enhance and critique project planning documentation as well as applying soft skills in a team leadership context and recognizing and initiating change in organisations.<\/p>\n
Superior Paper Help – Outline of contents
\n– – Note: The following week by week content is indicative only. The order may change and will also be affected by the calendar of the delivery location as this module is delivered by partners across the world as well as on-campus.<\/p>\n
ASSESSMENT BRIEF<\/p>\n
Academic year and term:\t2022\/23 \u2013 Semester A
\nModule title:\tAdvanced Project Management
\nFor further module – description see above Module Brief.
\nAssessment deadline:\tAssignment 2: Report – Case Study Analysis. 6th Jan 2023, 2pm<\/p>\n
Instructions for assessment: Summative components overview<\/p>\n
Components of summative assessment
\nIndividual or group submission?\tWord count\tWeighting\tMust Attempt
\nY\/N\tMust Pass
\nY\/N\tSub-components
\nAssignment 1: Timed MCQ Assessment\tIndividual\t1000\t25%\tYes\tNo\tn\/a
\nAssignment 2: Report (Case study analysis)\tIndividual\t3,500\t75%\tYes\tNo\tn\/a<\/p>\n
Instructions for Assessment
\nSummative Assessment
\nAssessment : Case Study Analysis
\nYou are required to choose from the following project case studies, all of which are relatively well documented online and in textbooks. – – Note that some are great successes, some are terrible failures and some could be argued either way depending on your perspective. All are well documented but do make sure you focus on the way project management processes were (or were not) followed and do not use up large word count on engineering or technical – descriptions as this is not an engineering module:<\/p>\n
\u2022\tSpace Shuttle Challenger testing and launch
\n\u2022\tCrossrail implementation on London\u2019s tube network
\n\u2022\tSiemens Business Services \u2013 UK Passport system development and launch
\n\u2022\tComparing & Contrasting Burj Khalifa Dubai (& The Shard UK design and build)
\n\u2022\tBoeing 787 development
\n\u2022\tThe Thames Tideway Upgrading London\u2019s Sewer System
\nOptions
\nEnvironmental Projects (UK, Europe or World): Energy, Utilities, Flood and Coastal Erosion
\nThere must be a major project undertaking in order to base your development against.<\/p>\n
You job for this assignment is to analyse and critique the success or failure of the project specifically in terms of its project management capability and to tell us what you have learned from this. For example, Burj Khalifa was an engineering success story but, as a project, can it, and should it, be seen as successful? In this particular case how does it compare to \u2018The Shard\u2019 in its approach to development and construction techniques. Do not get distracted by detail of the engineering processes or technical design. These may be important but your focus MUST be on the application of the project management process throughout the project\u2019s lifecycle. Specifically, analyse the case\u2019s approach to risk management and stakeholder management. You will draw on the perspectives of project management best practice and academic literature and demonstrate your understanding of how the case does or does not reflect this best practice. The tasks and marking criteria are as follows:<\/p>\n
1.\tDiscuss and critique the project team\u2019s approach to the management of project risk (20%)
\n2.\tHomework help: Write Online Essays Papers Homework for you – Analyse the approach to stakeholder management (20%)
\n3.\tDecide to what extent you believe the project (or some aspects of it) should be seen as a success. Research Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer – Critique and compare your view with that of others (media, investors, employees, etc.) and justify your position. Having reviewed risk management, stakeholder management and the success or failure of the project what lessons can be learned. (25%)
\n4.\tFrom above (and wider projects investigations in a similar field) what can you offer to help the profession of project management in their applied application to projects? Specifically, if you were writing an article for the Association of Project Managers what would you highlight to the readers to help them in their careers and to do their own jobs better? (25%)
\n5.\tOverall quality of writing, presentation and academic standards (referencing syntax, etc.). (10%)
\nThis is an individual report and should be approximately 3,500 words, not including references, diagrams, tables, appendices and headings.<\/p>\n
To help you, the following is a suggested template structure for your report although this is not prescriptive and you are free to use a different structure if you prefer:<\/p>\n
\u2022\tTitle Page
\n\u2022\tAbstract
\n\u2022\tTable of Contents
\n\u2022\tBrief Introduction to the Project \u2013 what, why, where and when
\n\u2022\tRisk Management \u2013 approach to project risk management, major risks to project success, how specific risks were dealt with, etc.
\n\u2022\tStakeholder Management \u2013 who were the major stakeholders, why important, how were they managed?
\n\u2022\tSuccess Review \u2013 in what way was the project a success or failure \u2013 justify from multiple perspectives
\n\u2022\tRecommendations to Project Managers \u2013 this is worth 30% of the marks so spend some time on this and demonstrate depth of understanding
\n\u2022\tFinal conclusions
\n\u2022\tReferences
\n\u2022\tAppendices (if needed)<\/p>\n
Instructions for Re-sit<\/p>\n
The same assignment task as for the main assignment period applies to the re-sit, with further instructions see below.<\/p>\n
Presentation<\/p>\n
Your submission should be in the form of a professional report using appropriate structural elements and diagrams, figures, tables, etc. where relevant. It must also follow academic best practice with fully referenced sources, in-text citations and bibliography.<\/p>\n
Any written work should be spell-checked and a contents page should be included. Do not use various font sizes and colours, except where deliberate emphasis is appropriate for clarity and impact. Black ink, Arial, size 11, 1.5 lines spaced is recommended. Use DIN A4 format and page margins of 2.5 cm or 1 inch.<\/p>\n
Full reading list<\/p>\n
There will be weekly guided reading and you will be expected to undertake your own review of relevant literature, both academic and professional as well as internet sources relating to real business scenarios and cases.<\/p>\n
Essential Word Essay – Readings<\/p>\n
Pinto, J. K. (2020) Project Management: Achieving Competitive Advantage. (5th ed.) Pearson. (note: 2016 4th ed. Contains similar information and for the most part will be adequate)
\nStraw, G. (2015) Understanding Project Management: Skills and Insight for Successful Project Delivery. Kogan Page: London.<\/p>\n
Recommended Word Essay – Readings<\/p>\n
Carnell, C. & Todnem, R. (2014) Managing Change in Organisations. (6th ed.) Harlow: Prentice Hall.
\nGraham, N. (2008) PRINCE2 for Dummies. Chichester: Wiley.
\nHarris, E. (2009) Strategic Project Risk Appraisal and Management. Farnham: Gower.
\nKerzner, H. (2010) Project Management Best Practices: Achieving Global Excellence. (2nd ed.) Hoboken: Wiley & Sons.
\nLientz, P.B. & Ria, P.K. (2011) Project Management for the 21st Century. (3rd ed.) Routledge.
\nMaylor, H. (2010) Project Management. (4th ed.) Harlow: Prentice Hall.
\nMoran, R.T. & Youngdahl, W.E. (2008) Leading Global Projects: For Professional and Accidental Project Leaders. Burlington: Butterworth-Heinemann.
\nSchwalbe, K. (2016) Information Technology Project Management. (8th ed.) Boston: Cengage.<\/p>\n
Further Reading<\/p>\n
Aaltonen, K. & Kujala, J. (2016) Towards an improved understanding of project stakeholder landscapes. International Page Essay – Journal of Project Management 34(8) pp. 1537\u20131552.
\nAdler, P.S., Mandelbaum, A., Nguyen, V., & Schwerer, E. (1995) From project to process management: An empirically-based framework for analyzing product development time. Management Science 41(3) pp. 143\u2013165.
\nAlarc\u00f3n, L.F., Ashley, D.B., de Hanily, A.S., Molenaar, K.R., & Ungo, R. (2010) Risk planning and management for the Panama Canal expansion program. Page Essay – Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 137(10) pp. 762\u2013771.
\nAlfons, M., Sierk Y., Karen, S., Stewart, C., & Tyrone, P. (2016) Clash of the titans: Temporal organizing and collaborative dynamics in the Panama Canal Megaproject. Organization Studies 37(12) pp. 1745\u20131769.
\nAlnsour, B.H. (2014) The Use of Virtual Project Teams for Project Management in Jordanian Corporations. Eurasian Page Essay – Journal of Business and Management 2(2) pp. 50\u201360.
\nAnbari, F., Khilkhanova, E., Romanova, M., Ruggia, M., Tsay, H-H., & Umpleby, S. (2009) Managing Cross-Cultural Differences in Projects. Paper presented at PMI Global Congress, 2009, Orlando.
\nBakker, R.M. (2011) Managing the Project Learning Paradox: A set theoretic approach towards knowledge transfer. International Page Essay – Journal of Project Management 29(5) pp. 494\u2013503.
\nBender, M.B. (2010) A Manager\u2019s Human Written Academic Papers – Guide to Project Management: Learn How To Apply Best Practices. Upper Saddle River: FT Press.
\nChin, M.M.C. & Spowage, A.C. (2012) Project Management Methodologies: A Comparative Analysis. Page Essay – Journal for the Advancement of Performance Information and Value 4(1) pp. 106\u2013118.
\nChuing Loo, S., Abdul\u2010Rahman, H., & Wang, C. (2013) Managing external risks for international architectural, engineering, and construction (AEC) firms operating in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states. Project Management Page Essay – Journal 44(5) pp. 70\u201388.
\nCiutiene, R. & Meiliene, E. (2014) Influence of cultural differences on implementation of international projects: Sample of international educational projects. Page Essay – Journal of Advanced Management Science 2(3) pp. 254\u2013259.
\nCuellar, M. (2010) Assessing project Success: Moving beyond the triple constraint, International Research Workshop on IT Project Management, 2010.13. http:\/\/aisel.aisnet.org\/irwitpm2010\/13
\nDey, P. (2012) Project risk management using multiple criteria decision-making technique and decision tree analysis: A case study of Indian oil refinery. Production Planning & Control 23(12) pp. 903\u2013921.
\nDidraga, O. (2013) The role and the effects of risk management in IT projects success. Informatica Economica 17(1) pp. 86\u201398.
\nEvaristo, R. (2003) The management of distributed projects across cultures. Page Essay – Journal of Global Information Management 11(4) pp. 58\u201370.
\nHodgson, D (2002) Disciplining the professional: The case of project management. Page Essay – Journal of Management Studies 39(6) pp. 803\u2013821.
\nJoslin, R. & Muller, R. (2015) Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International Page Essay – Journal of Project Management 33(6) pp 1377\u20131392.
\nKaliba, C., Muya, M., & Mumba, K. (2009) Cost escalation and schedule delays in road construction projects in Zambia. International Page Essay – Journal of Project Management 27(5) pp. 522\u2013531.
\nMatos, S. & Lopes, E. (2013) PRINCE2 or PMBOK: A question of choice. Procedia Technology 9 pp. 787\u2013794.
\nMinavand, H., Farahmandian, S., & Minaei, V. (2013) HR challenges of project managers. IOSR journal of business and management 11(5) pp. 40-45.
\nNewton, R. (2009) The Practice and Theory of Project Management: Creating Value Through Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
\nOchieng, E.G. & Price, A.D.F. (2009) Addressing cultural issues when managing multicultural construction project teams. Association of Researchers in Construction Management pp. 1273\u20131282.
\nRodrigues, I. & Sbragia, R. (2013) The cultural challenges of managing global project teams: A study of Brazilian multinationals. Page Essay – Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 8(1) pp. 38\u201352.
\nSarkar, S. & Kovid, R.K. (2015) Framework of risk factors and financing implications for road projects in India: Study of selected cases. Pacific Business Review International 8(2) pp. 110\u2013122.
\nStewart, J (2006) Cross Culture Project Management. Paper presented at PMI\u00ae Global Congress 2006\u2014North America, Seattle, WA. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
\nToo, E.G. & Weaver, P. (2014) The Management of Project Management: A conceptual framework for project governance. International Page Essay – Journal of Project Management 32(8) pp. 1\u201325.<\/p>\n
How will your work be assessed?<\/p>\n
Your work will be assessed by a subject expert who will use either the marking criteria provided in the section \u201cInstructions for assessment\u201d or the Marking rubric enclosed in the Appendix – Top Uni Researchers Bridge Essays UK Writings Help For Your Assignments, as appropriate for this module. When you access your marked work, it is important that you reflect on the feedback so that you can use it to improve future assignments.<\/p>\n
Referencing and Submission<\/p>\n
You must use the Write My Essay For Me | Essay Writing Service For Your Papers – Harvard System.<\/p>\n
Appendix – Top Uni Researchers Bridge Essays UK Writings Help For Your Assignments: Marking rubric (to be updated autumn 2021)<\/p>\n
Rubric – grade miners score category
\n(range)
\nAssigned mark >>
\nMarking criteria
\n(weight out of 100\tNot done<\/p>\n
0\tFail
\n(20-29)
\n25\tFail
\n(30-39)
\n35\tMarginal Fail
\n(40-49)
\n45\tAdequate
\n(50-59)
\n55\tGood
\n(60-69)
\n65\tVery Good (70-79)
\n75\tExcellent
\n(80-89)
\n85\tOutstanding<\/p>\n
100
\nAppraisal of Risk Management aspects<\/p>\n
(20%)<\/p>\n
Quality and application of relevant project management theory to support analysis of approach to risk management on the project. Reference to relevant project management literature to support analysis of research. Quality of analysis\/range of sources, evidence of research effort. Quality of discussion.\tMissing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.\tLittle or no analysis. Theory not applied. Very little use of relevant reference material. Artefacts either missing or largely irrelevant\tWeak, superficial analysis at best, project not properly investigated using appropriate sources and lightweight, limited use of theory. Referencing poor and few appropriate sources used to enhance report. \tStill weak and superficial analysis with some valid attempt vague alluded to.\tAdequate investigation using a range of appropriate sources to inform your answer. Some evidence of wider reading and research into the issues discussed. Reasonable use and application of theory to support analysis. Argument somewhat superficial but basic points covered.
\nGood evidence of thorough investigation with research informing your answer and supporting extensive use of theory. Analysis clear and relevant, based on variety of sources and depth of understanding of project management techniques demonstrated. Argument shows reasonable depth of understanding. \tConsiderable evidence of solid research into the project. Extensive use of theory to support highly analytical approach that demonstrates deep understanding. Argument compelling and credible\tDemonstrates a sophisticated approach to the application of theory to practice. Project has been researched in depth and sources have been used to provide considerable insight. Argument demonstrates an impressive, thorough understanding of the challenges faced by project managers.\tOutstanding and flawless.
\nAppraisal of Stakeholder Strategy Management Approach<\/p>\n
(20%)<\/p>\n
Quality and application of relevant project management theory to support analysis of stakeholder management on the project. Reference to relevant project management literature to support analysis of research. Quality of analysis\/range of sources, evidence of research effort. Quality of discussion.\tMissing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted\tLittle or no analysis. Theory not applied. Very little use of relevant reference material. Artefacts either missing or largely irrelevant.\tWeak, superficial analysis at best, project not properly investigated using appropriate sources and lightweight, limited use of theory. Referencing poor and few appropriate sources used to enhance report. Stakeholders list might have been alluded to.\tSome but vague and\/or confused analysis of project.\tAdequate investigation using a range of appropriate sources to inform your answer. Some evidence of wider reading and research into the issues discussed. Reasonable use and application of theory to support analysis. Argument somewhat superficial but basic points covered. Acknowledges obvious stakeholders.\tGood evidence of thorough investigation with research informing your answer and supporting extensive use of theory. Analysis clear and relevant, based on variety of sources and depth of understanding of project management techniques demonstrated. Argument shows reasonable depth of understanding. Acknowledges stakeholders from society as well as policy and business community, some thoughtful focus.\tConsiderable evidence of solid research into the project. Extensive use of theory to support highly analytical approach that demonstrates deep understanding. Argument compelling and credible. Acknowledges stakeholders from society as well as policy and business community, excellent focus.\tDemonstrates a sophisticated approach to the application of theory to practice. Project has been researched in depth and sources have been used to provide considerable insight. Argument demonstrates an impressive, thorough understanding of the challenges faced by project managers. Demonstrates deep insight of stakeholders from society as well as policy and business community, excellent focus thorughout.\tOutstanding and flawless.
\nCritical Review of Project Success & Lessons Learned<\/p>\n
(25%)<\/p>\n
Quality and application of relevant project management theory to support analysis of success of the project. Reference to relevant project management literature to support analysis of research. Quality of analysis\/range of sources, evidence of research effort. Quality of discussion.\tMissing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted\tLittle or no analysis. Theory not applied. Very little use of relevant reference material. Artefacts either missing or largely irrelevant. No discussion provided.\tWeak, superficial analysis at best, project not properly investigated using appropriate sources and lightweight, limited use of theory. Referencing poor and few appropriate sources used to enhance report. No discussion provided.\tStill weak and superficial analysis with some valid attempt vague alluded to.\tAdequate investigation using a range of appropriate sources to inform your answer. Some evidence of wider reading and research into the issues discussed. Reasonable use and application of theory to support analysis. Argument somewhat superficial but basic points covered. Discussion could be more critical and informed by data but overall good attempt.\tGood evidence of thorough investigation with research informing your answer and supporting extensive use of theory. Analysis clear and relevant, based on variety of sources and depth of understanding of project management techniques demonstrated. Argument shows reasonable depth of understanding. Well informed and critical discussion.\tConsiderable evidence of solid research into the project. Extensive use of theory to support highly analytical approach that demonstrates deep understanding. Argument compelling and credible. Very good and well informed discussion.\tDemonstrates a sophisticated approach to the application of theory to practice. Project has been researched in depth and sources have been used to provide considerable insight. Argument demonstrates an impressive, thorough understanding of the challenges faced by project managers. Impressive depth and scope of discussion.\tOutstanding and flawless.
\nProject Management Professional Application (25%)<\/p>\n
Quality and application of relevant project management theory to support analysis of Professional Application on the project. Reference to relevant project management literature to support analysis of research. Quality of analysis\/range of sources, evidence of research effort. Quality of discussion.
\nMissing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.\tLittle or no analysis. Theory not applied. Very little use of relevant reference material. Artefacts either missing or largely irrelevant. Uncritical and descriptive writing\tWeak, superficial analysis at best, project management not properly investigated\/considered using appropriate sources and lightweight, limited use of theory. Referencing poor and few appropriate sources used to enhance report. Uncritical or descriptive writing.\tSome but vague and\/or confused analysis of project management application.\tAdequate investigation\/consideration using a range of appropriate sources to inform your answer. Some evidence of wider reading and research into the issues and considerations discussed. Reasonable use and application of theory to support analysis. Argument somewhat superficial but basic points covered. Overall critical approach to discussion.\tGood evidence of thorough investigation\/considerations with research informing your answer and supporting extensive use of theory. Analysis clear and relevant, based on selected project with a variety of sources and depth of understanding of project management techniques demonstrated. Argument shows reasonable depth of understanding. Highly critical approach to discussion.\tConsiderable evidence of solid research into the selected project. Extensive use of theory to support highly analytical approach that demonstrates deep understanding. Argument compelling and credible. Highly critical approach to discussion.\tDemonstrates a sophisticated approach to the application of theory to practice. Project has been researched in depth and sources have been used to provide considerable insight. Argument demonstrates an impressive, thorough understanding of the challenges faced by project managers. Highly critical approach to discussion.\tOutstanding and flawless.
\nProfessionalism and Presentation<\/p>\n
(10%)<\/p>\n
Quality of writing and document presentation, use of structure, correct syntax of references (this 10% will instead be used to mark the reflective piece in in the case of resits)<\/p>\n
Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted\tUnintelligible writing. Very messy presentation, lacking use of structure. References not listed.\tVery poor writing. Poor quality of document presentation with little use of structure. References poorly and incorrectly provided\tWriting poor with significant impact of report credibility. Little use of structure and references often inconsistent.\tWriting poor with significant impact of report credibility. Presentation with limited structure. References sometimes inconsistent\tAdequate quality of writing with modest errors throughout. An attempt has been made to use appropriate structure. References generally correct with minor errors \tWell written and presented with good use of structure. Tables, diagrams, etc. correctly labelled. References correct to Write My Essay For Me | Essay Writing Service For Your Papers – Harvard standards\tProfessional standard of report that would be worthy of giving to a commercial client. Exemplary standard of writing throughout with wholly correct and appropriate presentation.\tOutstanding and flawless.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Advanced Project Management Client selected \u2022 Comparing & Contrasting Burj Khalifa Dubai (& The Shard UK design and build) Your job for this assignment is\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1395,1392,1387,1388,1386,1385,1389,1393,1390,1394,1391],"tags":[1402,1401,1398,1248,1396,828,350,1403,1399,35,1397,1404,1400],"class_list":["post-2615","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-australia-essay-writers","category-canada-essay-writers","category-cheap-essay-writer-australia","category-cheap-essay-writer-canada","category-cheap-essay-writer-uk","category-cheap-essay-writer-usa","category-homework-help-writing-service-usa","category-ireland-essay-writers","category-nursing-help-writing-service-usa","category-uae-essay-writers","category-usa-essay-writers","tag-assignment-help-websites","tag-best-essay-writing-service-china","tag-do-my-assignment","tag-do-my-essay","tag-essay-typer-online","tag-homework-help","tag-student-assignment-help","tag-university-assignment-help","tag-write-my-college-essay","tag-write-my-essay-australia","tag-write-my-essay-for-me-cheap","tag-write-my-research-paper-online","tag-write-my-term-paper"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2615","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2615"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2615\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2615"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2615"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colapapers.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2615"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}